xt73bk16mf8w_912 https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt73bk16mf8w/data/mets.xml https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt73bk16mf8w/data/51w14.dao.xml unknown 35 Cubic Feet 77 boxes archival material 51w14 English University of Kentucky Copyright has not been assigned to the University of Kentucky.  Contact the Special Collections Research Center for information regarding rights and use of this collection. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and Lexington and Eastern Railway Company records Railroads -- Appalachian Region -- History. Railroads -- Kentucky -- History. Southwestern Reporter, October 28, 1914 text Southwestern Reporter, October 28, 1914 2016 https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt73bk16mf8w/data/51w14/Box_75/Folder_4/10145.pdf section false xt73bk16mf8w_912 xt73bk16mf8w L 9,1»; ; we; E;_," “"'/
Vol. 169—-—No. 9 i P. 569—632,
OCTOBER 28, 1914 '
WT;
NATIONAL REPORTER SYSTEM] AMERICAN DIGEST SYSTEM
(Every Case Reported) (Every Case Digested)
‘ ATLANTIC NORTHEASTERN ?Annomed to CENTURY DIGEST(1658—1896)
FEDERAL NORTHWESTERN DECENNIAL DIGEST (189749“) Y
' PACIFIC SOUTHEASTERN AMERICAN DIGEST (Key-No. Sui“)
r SOUTHERN SOUTHWESTHN V MONTHLY DIGESTS (‘0 at“) b
(U.SJ SUPREME N.Y. SUPPLEMENT J REPORTER DIGESTS '
ONE CASE A KEY TO ALL CASES 1
:::I Z I I I :7 I’WI I”‘— I ’t
.I. I... .'...-.lll-IIIIIIIII
I I
" Y J "
:. ou cannot stan pat ;.
I. on the definitions of words announced I:
_ I. by the courts many years ago, for some I.
' '. of them have been changed by the '-
:l dec1$lons of the last ten years. :I
I . . . I
' Look 1t up In Words & Phrases, 2d Series '.
I
- ll.-II.I.....I....'-.-..--;---.I-
m L._—v}:w':;m_ I_ I I I I I I I I 7._ I I I I I
WEST PUBLISHING CO.
.— ST. PAUL, MINN. '
' Subscrlifllon P—rlce, payable in advance, $5 a, veal-371:;lfilngwlnlndlng and
' delivery othound volumes, ’4 I volume. Single numbers 250 each.

 SEES: ».
The 4
L I ’ I V .
200,000 Definitions
_,) . in Words & Phrases I
V‘First and seCOn'd Series
_'demonstrate L that it'is dangerous to use a word in. .
:_drawing a will, or a deed, or a contract, without ‘
2, being sure of its meaning. ‘ i
w The constructions placed byithe‘ courts, upon words
:and phrases that have been the subject of contro- .'
.; versy during the past decade are collected in
Words & Phrases r
3 1 - Second Series 2}
‘ OREER FORM
1 ' I. g e “.191
‘ WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY, St. Paul, Minnesota. V ,
Gentlemen: You may send on acceptance of this order i
WORDS & PHRASES, SECOND SERIES, bound in buckram, E
_ at $24.00 delivered.
Name- .. ,. Address.“ I {j
CIOMZ
' it]

 I
\- I
,, hhh‘ll av NUMBER SYSTEM
Copyright, 1914, by West Publishing Co.
___—___—
, VOL. 169 WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1914 NO. 9
l ___—.___.
i
. PAGE
‘.' TABLE OF CASES REPORTED iii
. TABLEOF CASES'ON REHEARING iii
INDEX—DIGEST v
t « -
; TABLE OF STATUTES CONSTRUED....................._.... x1
1, a _
t COURTRULES x111
TEXT569—632
)2 ___—___...—
i
' B 11 t' d B k N
7 The West Publishing Co. publishes this week:
_' 5 VOLUME 141 PACIFIC REPORTER;
, VOLUME 12 SOUTHWESTERN DIGEST (151—165 S. W.).
.l
‘4 On a following page will be found a list of “See here,” said his honor to the parent,
§ secondhand Digests, Codes, and Statutes. “this boy of yours has been up in court so
' many times for stealing chickens that I am
. 33 3:? tired of seeing him here.”
' Harper & Bros. has published a volume by H “l df’ESh't blame yo'. ledge,” said the father.
3 former president William Howard Taft entitled 3:“ '5 tired 0f seeln’ h'm here."
, “The Anti-trust Act and the Supreme Court.” ‘Then why don’t you teach him how to 3“?
“Emphasizes the necessity of an independent §h°W h“?! the right way. and he won’t be 00m-
“ Judiciary to uphold popular government, and mg here. _ . H
u . explains some of the famous decisions of the .I has showed him the right way, Jedge,
»- Supreme Court in the cases of the Standard Oil Sf“? the old man, very earnestly. I has cer-
‘ Trust, etc. Corrects popular errors in regard tny showed hhh de "‘9“t way,’but somehow
w to the effect of the decrees in famous anti-trust dat WUthle§S nlgger‘ keeps gettln caught com-
A- 5 cases.” 133 pages. Price, $125 net. ln’ away wuf do chlckens.”—Exchange. .
. 33E 33
The Baidwm Law Book Company, Louisville,
.- 1 Ky., announces a new edition of the Kentucky
Statutes by John D. Carroll to be ready for de- Dean George Chase, 0f the New York ‘Law
livery January, 1915, The editor is Judge Car- School, is the editor of the new fourth edltion
roll of the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, whose of Chase’s Blackstone. which is thoroughly re-
statutes have been the authority in the state “55d and the notes brought down to date.
for 20 years. it has been six years since the “This has been issued in order that the nu-
last edition, and this edition will be complete merous notes 0f the American editor might be
to date, including the acts of 1914. The set is brought dqwn to date, _and 8° represent English
thoroughly annotated, with full notes of all de- and Amerlcan law In Its present development.
cisions of the Court of Appeals to date. The Very important changes I" the law have been
_5 Southwestern Reporter (Kentucky Decisions) Wl‘OUth by recent statutes, 35v e. Q-i the Em.
citation for the cases reported in that series Is pioyers' Liablllt)’ ACtS. the Workmen’s Com-
aiways given. Two volumes, of 1200 pages pensation Laws, the United States Judicial
. each. Code, the United States Criminal Code, the
1. 1:1 33 amendments of the United States Bankruptcy
-"_ Law, the statutes affecting the organization
A HOPELESS PUPlL. into the police court and jurisdiction of courts, the domestic rela—
of Moblle there had been haled for the fourth tions laws of the different states, etc." One
time a negro boy, charged with chicken steai- large volume, nearly 1200 pages, buckram, $6.50
{1 ing. The magistrate determined to appeal to net. Published by The Banks Law Publishing
.’1 the boy’s father. Company.
=——-————-——————————_.*—_
Entered at the Post-Ofl‘i‘ce at St. Paul, and admitted for transmission through the mails. at Second-Class Rates
A3339 (i)
’.I

 V 1
NATIONAL REPORTER SYSTEM i".
Th6 SOUIIIWCSIOI‘II RCPOI‘IOI' ”V
(
___—___—
. . . i
Reports of Every D601SlOIl of the Courts of Last Resort of 1
L
ARKANSAS 2":
_ KENTUCKY 2
i 1.
MISSOURI 33.3333? . .. ,'
{3 l
- TENNESSEE ~ 22:
Su.C.,C.oCriru. . .' ‘.‘
TEXAS and) Ct.t of Civapp. App 1 .i
- . . . ~ 1
Every Case 1n Full Immedlately After Flhng 2 1
Issued every Wednesday by .
WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY, St. Paul, Minn. 2'
___ “f
2 Terms of Subscription, $5.00 a year, payable in advance; including binding and delivery of
bound volumes, $4.00 a volume. Single numbers 25c. each. 1
Register your letters when you send money, or else send draft or post-office order. We will i
not be responsible for money lost in the mails. .
2 The Entire System Embraces . 1
Norltheastern Reporter. Established 1885. Massachusetts, New York, Ohio, Indiana, and .i
llinois. ‘ .
. ’;l
Northwestern Reporter. Established 1879. Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Ne- I -
braska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. '
Pacific Reporter. Established 1883. California, Oregon, Kansas, Colorado, Nevada, Mon- .- '."
tana, Wyoming, Washington, Idaho, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, and Oklahoma. ‘
Atlantic Reporter. Established 1885. Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode Island, ‘
Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland.
Southwestern Reporter. Established 1886. Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Missouri, 1
and Texas. i
Southeastern Reporter. Established 1887. Virginia,West Virginia, North Carolina, South
Carolina, and Georgia. 1
l
Southern Reporter. Established 1887. Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana. I
Federal Reporter. Established 1880. All the U. S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, the Circuit '
and District Courts, and the Commerce Court. .
Supreme Court Reporter. Established 1882. The Supreme Court of the United States. I
The New York Supplement. All the decisions of the Appellate Division of the Supreme I '
Court (all departments) and Appellate Term; also decisions of the Trial and Special Terms, ,
Surrogates Courts, City Court of New York, County Courts, etc.
Sold se aratel 'or in combination 5
6103 i
._ A . .._—EH ,., it

 l
I
1|,
I- KENTUCKY. KENTU CKY—Cont’d.
. Adams Exp. _Co. v. Connnonwealtli (Ky.). . (303 \Vasioto & B. M. R. Co. v. Blanton (Ky.)_. . 589
Bartley V. Big Branch (final (‘0. (I\y.) . . . . . (301 \Villiamson's Adm’r v. Norfolk & “'. R. (10.
‘ (101011121117 1'. (,‘ominoiiivealtli (Ky) .. ... . . . 55):) (Ky) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . 613
111111015 Cent. It. (31). v. Seiliold (Ky). . . . .. (310 “'instou v. Louisville & N. 1:. Co. (Ky.). . . 5517
1&1an v. I\entucky Board of Pharmacy \Vood v. Nall (Ky). . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . 515!)
(I\.\'.) .- . - . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .; . . . . . . . . . . .. (3001 Yenawine V. Tyei'ete»(.‘oncrete Products Co. _,.
Lawson v. Commonwealth (I\y.). . . . . . . . .. as: (Ky) ,. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 094:
Loel) V. Conley (K12). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. {17:1 -
) Martin v. Franklin (Ky). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :19!) TENNESSEE,
1 . .’., ~... 1".” '. -~)( 7 . V . ‘ ,
11"£2?1t3{8\:\(1'1111'i]l)l‘)l('] 1113:") (I\‘\")' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' i ' ::fi—g l Ixnoxville Table & Chair Co. V. kerr Bros. 20
L Rutland \'. (‘oiumomvealth (Ky) . . . . . . . . 58-1 & 01055 (101111). ‘ " "' ' ' ' ' ' ‘ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' G O
:; Sansom 1‘. Ewell (l\'\) 571 ‘1 ,
‘.' Saunders \'. Flemiiigshurg (K31). .. . . . . . . . £275 ' 1DX:‘S'_‘
;, Smith, Ex 1):ll‘t(‘ (Ky) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 082 Dilwortli .& Green v. Ld Stoves & Sons 0
.'“ Snmleker v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (Tex. Civ. App). .' . . . . . .. .. .. ..‘. . . . 23' 6.10
1- (K32) .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 570 Sanford v. John Finnigau (_‘,o. (lex. (,.1V. 0
1 1 Thomas 1'. Marshall (Ky.)............... 615 App.) ‘ 0:3
_'5: 1 Van Meter V. Van Meter (Ky). . . . . . . . . . 592 Spauldiiig v. Smith (Tex. ( 1v. App). . . . . . (1.1
l TABL]; OF CASES ON REHEARING
1 L
'1 r In the followmg cases, petitions for rehearing: are pcndmg:
f f KENTUCKY. TEXAS—Cont'd. TEXAS—Cont‘d.
.. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co. Collier v. Smith (Civ. App.) June MeSpadden v. Vannerson (Civ.
, v. Blankenship, 163 S. W. 1123. 13, 1914. App.) March 28. 19111.
» Jolly’s Adm'r v. First Nat. Bank Commonwealth Bonding & Casuai— Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Ward
-' of Iowa City, April 23. 1914. ty Insurance Co. v. Bomar (Civ. (Civ. App.) June 24, 19111.
~ Logan v. \Villiams, 167 S. XV. 124. App.) May 30, 1914. O’Fallin v. State (Cr.) June 24,
.f Millers Creek R. Co. v. Barnett, Conn v. Marshburn (Clv. App.) 1914.
167 S. w, .102, .lune 9, 1914. Pecos & N. T. R. Co. v. Morrison
Southern Nat. Bank v. Sehimplor. Davis v. Burns (Civ. App.) Feb. (Civ. App.) July 4, 1911.
. 167 S. \V_ 118. 23, 1914. Quanah A. & P. R. Co. v. Chum-
, ! Turner V. Johnson Ex’rs, 166 S. W. Dunbar v. Texas Irr. Co. (Clv. bley (Civ. App.) July :1, 1914.
1 1027, App.) June 25. 1912. Certilied to Railway Co. v. Love (Civ. App).
~ MISSOURI. FSupreme1 Court. Higgins v. Post (Civ. App.) June
. . . t. \VOrti & D. C. R. CO. v. 'J, 1914.
Hgtcllgilion v. Mullins (App.) OCt' Seheer (Civ. App.) June 21). 1914. Roberts v. Nunn (Civ. App.) June
‘ '_1 ' ' . V . Ft. Worth & R. G. R. Co. v. 27, 1911.
' 1““?93’ " Rational Newspaper Mathews (Civ. App.) June 10, Ross v. Southern Surety Co. (Civ.
. 1 “13:15,? (Apflgeker (Eu ) 11114. App.) June 21, 11111.
, ‘7 ”r V‘ y p. ' Freeman v. Clark (Clv. App.) June SeYI'iltO v. State (Cr.) May 6, 1914.
J Smith v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. - . , . .A . , . .
'1 Co (App) Oct 5 1914 1, 1.111. Certilicd to Supreme Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the
-, - ' ' . ‘ (uiirt. \Vorld v. Lillard (Civ. App.)
bl TEXAS French v. Southwestern Telegraph June 17, 19111.
. 4v ‘ & Telephone Co. (Civ. App.) 162 Spiller v. Hollinger (Civ. App.)
p . Amarillo Nat. Bank v. Panhandle S. \V. .106. Rehearing denied 118 S. W. 3:39.
Telephone 11’; Telegraph Co. (Civ. Jan. 8, 1914. Certified to Su< Swilley v. Phillips (Civ. App.)
1 App.) June 20, 1911. preme Court. June 17,1911.
.1- Amarillo Nat. Bank v. Sanborn Gnrrade v. State (Cr.) 160 S. W. Texas Bank & Trust Co. v. Smith
. 1' (Clv. ADDJ June 27. 1914. 695. (Civ. App.) June 215, 1912. our-
Anierlean National Ins. Co. v. Gonzales v. State (Cr.) May 13, tified to SiipremeCourt.
‘ ‘ Van Dusen (Civ. App.) Dec. 17. 1911. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Guilheim
1913. Certified to Supreme Court. Gonzales v. State (Cr.) June 3, (Civ. App.) June 10, 1914.
Avent v. Ormand (Civ. App.) June 1911. Wier v. Carter & Bros. (Civ.
10, 1911. IGesliorii v. Daniel (Civ. App.) App.) June 11, 1914.
Barnes v. State (Cr.) March 11. June 17, 1914. Yeziman v. Galveston City Co.
1 1911. Gulf, c. & s. F. R. Co. v. Battle (Civ. App.) June 22, 1911. Cer-
. Beaumont Irrigating Co. v. De- (Civ. App.) June 17, 1914. tified to Supreme Court, 167 S.
1 laune (Clv. App.) March 4. 1912. Gulf. C. & S. 14‘. R. Co. v. lloger \V. 710,
1 Certified to Supreme Court. (Civ. App.) June 13. 1914. Young Men's Christian Associa-
1 Beaumont Irr. Co. v. McDonald Hit-ks v. State (Cr.) Nov. 26, 1913. tion v, Jasse (Civ.App.) Oct.
. (Civ. App.) June 26, 1912. Cer- Lindsey v. City of Naeogdoehes 2-1, 1912. Certified to Supreme
1 tified to Supreme Court. (Civ. App.) June 19, 1914. Court.
‘ Brady—Neely Groeer Co. v. De .\Ir-(‘.iie v. State (Cr.) Dec. 3, 1913. Zweig v. State (Cr.) April 30
: Foe (Civ. App.) July 4. 1911. Mr-Kneely v. Armstrong (Civ. 1913. '
Central Bank & Trust Co. v. App) Certified to Supreme
Wiess (Civ. App.) April 21, 191-1. Court.
‘ In the following [(1561, rehearing: have been granted:
)5 KENTUCKY. MISSOURI—Cont’d. MISSOURI—Cont'd.
City of Louisville v. Pope, 162 S. Botts y. Wabash R. Co. (App) Gummerson v. K. C. Nut & Bolt
1 W. 780. Opinion filed March 3, 1914. Co. (App) Granted April 15
MISSOURI Granted April 9, 1914. 191.1. '
- DaVirlson v. Hartford Life Ins. Harrington v. Chicago. B. & Q. R.
- A1111? )v. Cl?roekmanfil (Corgi Cg- Cg. J(1117111213298. W. 291. Grant- Co. (App) Opinion filed Oct.
. pp.. pinion e ay , e une , 1 11. 6, 1913. G t
1914. Granted July 2, 1914. ””1 ed Dec' 1’ 1913‘
l A3340 (iii) (Rehearing‘s Cont’d on page v)
kl

 I O
Law School and Mlscellaneous Adverusements
W
NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL DESIRABLE CLIENTS
174 Fulton Street. New York City Home clients are the most remunerative in the long
Follows the “Dwight Method” of legal in- Eulnerlillizlls‘filétgrafii 22313181232313: Zofihyfin'ffi
structlon, Whlch makes preeminent the study'of the measure of his success. Building a. Law Busi-
Legal Principles and the Reasons upon which llfssl’ill Ilénvhto Aldvm‘tislc in fropcr li'gys, bg Geolfie
1 . ur , '. t t ira e
Eggniflsgt' 53:50]: fityndgrfighngr} afirtlgndalesfihgix‘] clients inoclegitsinill: 253%. olttgf'llso s‘lisszs elfaw lto
». ' secure oreign l'ent. and ac u211y com nan tie
'tlglge‘gagfilrg’ $13237; .Eifil‘riiaifé‘rfiniifffihii sources of mg; buiiness. \Vrlte for plrnculars.
the bar in the different States. The location of Murdoch Law Book Co" Newark. N, J
the school in the midst of the courts and law- 010942
yers’ oflices affords an invaluable opportunity to W
gain a 1knowledge fof flcourt procedure and the ‘
practica conduct 0 a airs. .
Send for catalogue explaining Dwight Method, UNIVERSITY otF MECHIGAN ..
courses 0f study, em" to Three years‘ 5.3:; lzaiililng go thend‘eéree of LL. B. "
GEORGE CHASE, Dean, 174 Fulton St. The degree of Juris Doctor (J. D.) open to graduates ‘7
C9989 of approved universities and colleges. Credit to-
w wards either degree may be obtained through work
in the summer session of ten weeks. Regular ses- ~ ._‘_
' ° COLLEGE sion October to June. inclusive. Law library of
orne nlverSIty OF LAW about 30,000 volumes. For announcements address E
hFEur-yeur gout-e for studle‘nts exiterlindg from nevusr‘lfeitnti afiwnliciugnn
ig ch 01 e r t o s, ncu as one 7 .;
year sot OinZtTI-iilictigg pl: atggy 5811239 of Arts and Box W‘ Ann Arbor. Mich. . é’
Sciences preliminary to the law subjects. 'l‘hree- c7684 5
year course (open only to those presenting at W 11’
least are year or college work) includes all the '
law subjects. Law Library of 43,000 volumes. Ex- . 2 2 * ‘2 -
tended courses in pleading and practice. For cata- e
iogue address 7."
DEAN on THE COLLEGE 015‘ LAW,Y ‘ . ’ ';2
070183 Cornell University. Ithaca. N. . NY BOOK 1n the I 5:
W _ , > r
rnbook Serles is = '-
INCORPORATE IN ARIZONA j 8‘ H0 , _
Most liberal laws in the United States. Cost small. better for Your purpose ’ .I';
Write for our free booklet containing Corporation Laws ‘_:
and other valuable information. We are lawyers. than the beSt three'VOI' ;‘3
ARIZONA CORPORATION CHARTER GUARANTEE co. ume treatise on the same l
313 National Bank of Arizona Bldg. , , , ‘ E-
C9928 Pnoamx. ARIZONA top1c, 1f what you desue -
W - . ‘
» 18 to run qulckly over l
NOTARY and CORPORATION SEALS , h . . 1 d . 2.
/ Lever seals, Plaln Letter- :' t 3 pr1nc1p 352 an re- 2
ing . . . . $2.00 ;
"g Handy Pocket Seals, Plain 2’ fr 9511 your memory 2 ,
Effie; Lettering . . . $2.00 ‘4 ; . sf
_59 Percussion Pocket Seals, ‘_ 2 2
-..,.—.__— Plain Letiering . $3.00 — .
With any State Coat oi Arms 75c extra 2 .
With any Special Design 50c and up extra 2.
NORTHWESTERN STAMP WORKS, St. Paul, Minn. '
09246 . $3.7 5 per vol, delzvered ».‘
‘ W :.‘
25 c____.How to Obtain a Successful West Publishing CO.
Commercxal Law Practice ;
Tells the plans and methods by which one lawyer built " T
up in a reasonably short time a very profitable practice ~ - » - v ‘ - - ‘ !
in commercial law business. Full of ideas and plans that
you can adopt to get such a practice and income for W
yourself. Bound in paper; 25:: in coin or stamps. .
AMER! LEG N 5 Is the Northeastern '
l ' l
725 FREE PRESS BLDG, DETROIT, MICH. m your lzbrary ? -
09190 .
010345—7 ,.‘
l
-... V ‘:‘—rm :

 TABLE OF CASES ON REHEARING—Continued
In the following cases, rehearings have been granted:
MISSOURI—Cont’d. MISSOURI—Cont’d. TEXAS—Cont’d.

Kansas City Coal & Material Co. Traylor v. White (App.). Opin- Wells Fargo 6}. Co._v. Mitchell
v_ Logan (App,). Granted April mn filed June 20, 1914. Granted (Civ. App.) April 2;). 1914. 4p-
15‘ 1914. July 2, 1914. pellant's niotionlglffr 1:‘Iellearintg

R k . A t 17 ’ _ _ _ denied July 4, ., 0 ion 0
(635mm: £10123 Glynn?) 1,(Ar:ii))131, TEXAS ' certify to Supreme Court denied
Granted Oct. 5' 1914' Gossett v. Vaughan (Civ. April). July 4, 19M. Appellees motion

Opinion filed April 27, 1914. for rehearing granted and ap—
Granted May 21, 1914. peal dismissed.
Cases transferred from Court of Appeals to Supreme Court:
MISSOURI. MISSOURI—Cont'd. MISSOURI—Cont'd.
Funk V; Kansas City (ADD-)v Johnson v. Dixie Mining & De- MeAllister v. St. Joseph St. Const.
“filigrliégle‘fredhJ1Wll§éllsle$ii9 (App.). Eyelopment Co. (App.) 156 S. W. Co. (App). Transferred Dec. 31.
. ‘ - .n. .., ._. . 1912.

.- Harrell v. Quincy, O. & K. R. Jones v. Anheuser—Busch Brew- Thomas v. English (App.) 167 S.

‘ 100-191(2ADIJJ- TraDSfEFI‘ed April kiln; 6Co.ml(2App.). Transferred W. 1147. Transferred June 2,
- . a . . 1913.

., Holder v. Chidester (App.) 162 S. y
f' W. 762. Transferred Jan, 28,

1914.

‘ w
INDEX-DIGES’P .
£7 @WK :v NUMBER‘ svsrm

_ .
L z
“ ’ (S. W., Vol. 169, No. 9)
:3 ACTION. See Dismissal and Nonsuit. APPEAL AND ERROR—Cont’d.
; §53 (Ky) \Vlierc railroad company by blast— tent under CIV- (Jude _1’1'510 § (500, iS harmless,
a ing threw into a river debris which could not be ”3 SCl'Vng only to COllfll‘ll1 detendant’s theory 0f

_ removed, causing the river to Wash away land the contract, 91' going t0 fl matter 110t in issue
',. 0n the opposite bank. held that there was a per- 01‘ SGEIOUSIY disputed—Moore’s Adm’r V. Pierce,

inanent injury and the. court improperly limited 169 b. “7- 620- ‘

. a recovery to the damages up to the date of §_1050 (Tex.Civ.App.) Where a witness de-
',7 the trial—Wasioto & B. M. R. Co. v. Blanton, scribed without objection and swore to the con-
‘ 169 S, W, 589_ le‘tslflr a clhecky 1ts admission was not preju—
(n-ia to de'endanl‘.—Santor(l v. John Finnia'an
it ADMINISTRnTION. See Executors and Ad- C0” ms) s. w, (:24, "

m1n15t1at01s. l §ll066 (Iliy.) 'Vlf’heil'e.defendant admitted that
s. . . T L { ‘ 1e {new 1) aintil's c aimed an interest in a tim-
id Agggggg aggrintshsgagmd failed to show 13%, COl-ltlract between defendant and R_., plain-
. how a railroad company acquired a siding, it ill? sepeilfmlitmdlifiCilgilchcgvgysgallgitgiggtlglllleflhite’
cannot be presumed that the railroad company’s might lawfully refuse to allow them {0 remove
_ Ef§n°£“Foii‘g‘iiie‘:’é‘SN“1%'°‘€5013°§‘295SS§"WW? iVi‘i; rimm- in question—“’ood v. Nall, 109 s.
, . .4 .. .. ..... H,“
k § |l4 (Ky) Certain facts held to establish the \- v . ‘ o

adverse title of defendant railroad company to a scivliggf“(.1125grialfflffii]bf‘fffigfimfifinfi‘£ggg qug

.. . _ ---....... .. ‘7.”: .‘ ,...
= sxdlng in“; tlo 511%)? tltmt plalfitlfiz Sy'fidlgmfi 11%] he ‘abnndoned it, the instruction. authorizing
' ‘,. ‘ £130 511%?) Slt6V—591ns 011 V- oursu ‘3 - ' a finding for her for $2.000 was harmless, the
' 0-; ' - - ‘- verdict being for only $750. and the value of
” APPEAL AND ERROR. See Courts. I‘l‘f “Tie? ‘30.”? 15,1131“? 3?}3'El‘¥}, W035}; hers"
q75I (Tex Civ App) Grounds of objection to l oores A (rm 1 " mice, J" h ' ~ ' - -
V evidence st‘lted in the assiU'nments of error oth- .§ [”6 (by) The Court Of {\l?l’0”1$ has JUI‘IS‘
; ‘ ‘ . " h : ' . . . dictlon to order a permanent injunction by final

er than those alleged in the bills of exception, 'ndwment in the action —§aund r v Cit f

' will not be reviewed.—Sanford v. John ani- in)“. esl _‘r If“; q “i ‘,.L, e S ' y 0

gan Co., 163 S. W. 624. (,llllllb., )111,., ). .,. . om.

' § |040 (Ky) The error in overruling fl demur- BANKS AND BANKING.

rer to a plea of limitations filed to an amended §77 (K52) Under Acts 1912 c. 4 § 18 bank-
petition “'35 “0t I>1'(:.l"dl0131-,'.“”1101"O “10131900?” in: commissioner in liquidatingr in’solven’t bank
tradlcted proot ?ho“%gl.1f.0nhlblitok‘é"€55 1323”} held authorized to sell real estate without eon-

! (flelfleaénliflfrfio‘éoy.1€9lgmlle’sogls3 m1 \- i 01' sent or direction of the. court and upon such
0 i U - - -» " r - ' - ’ ' terms as he believes to be to the best interests

, § l04| (Ky.) Though the volition alleges .an of all.—-Ex parte Smith, 109 s. w. 582.

i' CXDI‘GtSlS CODtFaCt, and the.Fl'00% 15 Of (an luéplélt‘d Under Bailiklng1 Act, \vfhen 1thel banking com-

one, here was. no nece551 .V 0' amen 111611 , .10 missioner ta (es eiarge 0 a min. he may act

. answer admlttlng an express contract, but, (115- Without an order of the court; his acts being
i Illitlng “{11118 0f S91'V1095-—M(>01‘es Admr V- subject to review by the court.—Id.

_ 1’161'089 109 S- W- (‘20- _ When the banking commissioner files a re-

§ I050 (Ky) Admission in an actlon against port of his administration of a bank, it should

. an administrator for services to (let-eased of tes— lay over for an opportunity to file a petltion
.' timony of plaintiff and her husband. Incompe— for a review, and. if none is filed where real es-
. _fl—fi—F—a

For cases in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Indexes see same topic and section (§) NUMBER
A334]. (V) (Index-Digest Cont’d on page vii)
Yll

 ' i
. . , .. - . . . '7
~ IS THE BEST MEDIUM WHEREB Y TO SECURE
EFFICIENT SERVICE FOR THE CARE OF
OUT- OF - TOWN TRANSACTIONS
The lawyers whose names appear therein have been selected '
because of their attainments in the legal profession, and because of
their qualifications in the practice of the commercial law: they special- ‘
ize in collections and in the management and care of the interests = t
of creditors. We list a lawyer and a bank wherever proper service ;
can be obtained in the United States, Canada, and other countries. 2
We have published the list continuously since 1899 under same ‘ i
management. We have records on all lawyers listed and have come E:
into personal contact with many of them. Our recommendations are {-3
of greatest value. ;
Users of our law list find highest satisfaction in the employment of S
lawyers through our recommendation: they have the advantages of 5
our complaint department in instances in which aid may be required .
in the course of correspondence with the lawyer. We keep close .'
scrutiny over the conduct of every lawyer employed under our rec-
ommendation; and we render effective aid when called upon by the y '
forwarders.
We protect those who send employments to our lawyers under our
instructions against overcharge for services rendered, and also against
default on moneys collected and wrongfully retained.
To~secure the advantage of our guaranty, follow our simple in- "
structions: send our forwarding form with the claim to the lawyer and
make application for guaranty on the item promptly to us. We
evidence our undertakingby a certificate of guaranty issued by the r
The Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland covering each item. ' ,_
If you require legal service awanyrom home, consult us. We shall .
advise you fully of our system and methods. " g
Trial copy of THE BONDED ATTORNEY is free upon request. l’
_ Representation is profitable to lawyers. Apply at once.
THE ASSOCIATION OF BONDED ATTORNEYS ’1
1417-1423 First National Bank Bldg, ' g;
‘ Milwaukee, Wisconsin. «7
i
Uluifi‘du

 l
S. W. INDEX—DIGEST, Vol. 169, No. 9—Continued
BANKS AND BANKING—Cont‘d. CONSTITUTIONAL LA‘ViCont‘d.
fate has been sold, the commissioner should be of (,‘onst. I'. S. Amend. 14.#l\'ing v. Kentucky
directed to execute conveyances, as is required Board of Pharmacy, 169 S. W. (300.
when real estate is sold under a judgment—id.
“'here real estate is sold by a bank, of which (‘ONTINUANCE
the banking commissioner takes charge. before § l4 (Ky.) T'nder Civ. Code Prac. § 1516. con-
he takes charge 110 should file a I'OIlfil't Slm‘mes’ tinuance need not be granted for amendment of
the fflCf- and, If no CKCCDUOUS 31'? “It‘d 1" “1“ the petition making,r no material change.—
report, the court should order him to collect Moore’s Adm’r v. Pierce, 109 S. “r1320.
any unpaid price and execute a conveyance.
, _Id- CONTRA\CTS. See Appeal mid Error:R Bills
. V and .'otes: Covenants: *‘rauds. Statute
BILLS AND AOTES' . of; Insurance; Reformation of Instru-
§537 (Tex-CiV-ADIJ.) EVidODCC MM t0 I'OQIHI'O meats: Specific Performance; Vendor and
submission to the jury as to whether a note Purchaser.
sued on had been executed to prevent a criminal
prosecution against one of the parties.~San- CORPORATIONS. See Banks and Banking;
ford v. John Finnigan Co., 160 S. \V. (513—1. Insurance; Railroads; Specific Perform-
ancc.
BURGLARY- §80 tKy.) In a suit to rescind a purchase of
‘ §9 (Ky.) Under Ky. St. §1102. construed lili— the corporate stock of defendant. evidence Izcld
erally as required by section 460. tllc ot'fcnse of insutlicient to show that plaintiff. the purchas-
' housebrcaking may be committed by an entry or, was a victim of fraud.—chawino v. Ty-
“ without breaking and a breaking out.~Lawson Crete-Concrete Products Co., ltit) S. \V. 594.
= 5, - v. Commonwealth, 169 S. \V. 587. .
f . . . COURTS. Sec Banks and Banking.
é (‘.\RRIERS. See Intoxicatmg quuors. §223 (K32) In a suit to restrain the collec-
34‘ _ _ , tion of a tax, the right to tax is the thing in
_ t COMMERCE. See IDtOXICMlDf-T quUOYS- controversy; and hence an appeal lies to the
.EV. ‘ § [4 (Ky) The Webb-Kenyon Act. relative to Court of Appeals. though the amount sought to
" the interstate shipment of intoxicating liquor, be collected is less than $200.—Saunders v.
», is not violated where the liquor is intended for City of Flemingsburg, 10".) S. \V. 575.
g the personal use of the consignee—Adams Ex-
»“. press Co. v. (‘onnnonwealth. iii!) S. \V. (303. COVENANTS
E’ Under the “lobbrKenyon Act interstate ship- §39 (KY-l ‘Vhere beneficiary of a deed to a
fly mcnts of intoxicating liquor to be used in vio— trustee had previously taken an option to pup.
g lation of state laws are not protected by the chase. at which time. the trustee. as his “my.
fC‘lL‘l'ill Constitution,_and‘ may be punished by ncy. was informed of a, sale of standing timber.
4 the states when 111 Violation 0t thelr laws—id. he could not assert his 12.110111th “f such sale
_: §6l (Ky.) Ky. St. § Zfitifia. relative to the in support of his claim of: breach of warranty.‘
' transportation of intoxicating liquors. is con- —[\‘ansom v. Ewell. 10$) S. W. 571.
stitutional and operative as to intrastate ship—
ments, but not as to interstate shipments prior CRIMINAL LA\V, St‘o Burglary; Indictment
to the passage of the \Vebb-Ix'enyon Act—Adams and Information; \Vitnossog,
» Express CO' V' Commonwealth, ltiil 5' “7: “0'0“ §386 (Kin) \Vhere a continuance for absence
. The \Vehh»Kenyon Act IS a valid exercise of ”f wimpggm was denied. and the affidavit 31-
the power to regulate interstate commerce con- Jogod certain conclusions as to “him the wit-
. féil‘l'Gd 011 COIMI‘CSS by COHSt- U- S- fll‘t- 1: § 8: nossos \vouid testify as to an alleged witness
subsec. 3-—Id- for the eonuuomvealt‘h, who was not ilnllroducfld
in chief the court did not err in exc u( in," t e
-' , " COMMERCIAL PAPER- SOC Bills and Notes. atlidavity as a part of dofemlants' main wise.—
. Lawson V. Commonwealth. 169 S. \V. 5R7.
) ‘v ‘ Av vw x f V
0031?}??MISE ARD Sl‘lell‘Ml‘Nl' Sec. §696 (K31) Delay from Saturday until Mon<
”"ane' day in striking out certain testii‘nony Ilrltl not
, , . CONSPIRACY. See Indictment and Informa— $.13"??le §§;""_R““““d " (“'“l‘mm‘mlth’
' tion: Witnesses. ' '2 " ‘_O‘ '. . .
Q h ,. .‘ . . 7 . . §l206(1\y.) Lnder the Indeternunatc ben-
i 340 (hy) the dismissal of an indictment . . . . . ( ' .,.. .. . '...
. . _ . . _ ttiue Law of 1J10, the Jlitlbt was obhgd to
. against $101.91: t“0f00{ifl)lrf}tors does not 1‘11"" sentence accused for a term not less than the
f ‘fi'ntt ‘: tong-lcflon 0"} 1‘“ U'ticl RIVER the “'10 minimum nor greater than the maximum pun-
L t a‘ .“ 0. DUI], 31‘ DTMTHSCMP‘ Duffs“), f” 3‘ ishment fixed, while under the act of" 191-1 (Acts
§gnspéfcy_ ‘“t ‘11“ “ tomonwca th' 16” 5' 1914, c. 15)) the jury fixes the punishment and
-‘ ‘ ”h ’_ , . _ may fix the minimum sentence at any period
i” §43 (RM) Indictment fOI‘. ChnSDII'mfl t0 fillSO‘ not less than the minimum nor greater than the
1.V {1001196. 51 DC‘I'SOH 0f 51 CI‘UTIO 101‘ fll“ purpose maximum proscribed bv law.~Coleman v. Com-
, of extortion held not defective for failure. to al— monwcalth. 1m, S. \\'_‘55);
. logo that another conspirator knew of the falsi— Under Ky, St. § 465. person indicted and tried
1 0' 0f the charge—Rutland "- Commonwealth, after enactment of indeterminate sentence law
'r 169 S- ‘V- 084- (if 1914, for loft‘ense connuittcd prior thereto.
j Icld not eutit ed to have the jury fix the pun-
ti CONSTI’IUTIONAL LAW. See Commerce; islunent under that act. as it does not definite-
i Intox1cat1ng quUOl'S- 1y mitigate the punishment imposed under the
‘ § 206 (Ky.) A rule of the Board of Pharmacy act of 1010 (Acts .1910. c. «ii—Id.
i requiring an applicant for reciprocal rcgistra- Under Ky. St. § 465. a defendant. wishing
tion as a druggist on a foreign certificate to the benefits of an act mitigating the punishment
l have been a bona tide resident and engaged in for an offense committed prior to its enact-
_ the retail drug business in such other state for ment. must consent on the record to have the
" one year before examination is not in violation punishment fixed thereumler.—-ld.
For cases in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & indexes see same topic and section (§) NUMBER
A3342 (vii) (Index-Digest Cont’d on page ix)

 Shepard’s Southwestern Reporter Citations
I
The Gulde to the Law
Texas, Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indian
Territory and Arkansas
Vol- 4 The full and complete history of every case
Southwestern . ,
(Page) _107__ reported 1n the Southwestern Reporter w1th
g 9%; M“ 5%; its citations from the entire Reporter System,
- 2 i8 32? showing the extent and degree of its author- ._
d 12 888 - .
f 20 883 1ty throughout the Unlted States and THE I
d 24 129
32 2391, CASE LAW UPON THE SUBJECT OF I
44 762 THE DECISION E
47 507 g
t 52 261 . .
f 61 817 Examine the citations of Sharkey vs. McDermott, a Mis- .,
2% gig souri case, reported in Vol. 4 Southwestern, page 107; the i
71 202 same case (s) is reported in 91 Missouri, page 647. This i
f 72 101 case has been cited twenty-seven times in the Southwest- :
3% 38% em, having been frequently followed (1') and several times
f 85 210 distinguished (d). ~
f 58;? fig This case has been cited by the courts of New York, Mich- ‘
t 95 961 igan, Indiana, Kansas, Nebraska, Minnesota, South Dakota, .
g; 233 Iowa, Montana and California, having been criticised, 1301- ,