xt73ff3m0f1n https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt73ff3m0f1n/data/mets.xml University of Kentucky. University Senate University of Kentucky. Faculty Senate Kentucky University of Kentucky. University Senate University of Kentucky. Faculty Senate 1965-02-08  minutes 2004ua061 English   Property rights reside with the University of Kentucky. The University of Kentucky holds the copyright for materials created in the course of business by University of Kentucky employees. Copyright for all other materials has not been assigned to the University of Kentucky. For information about permission to reproduce or publish, please contact the Special Collections Research Center. University of Kentucky. University Senate (Faculty Senate) records Minutes (Records) Universities and colleges -- Faculty University of Kentucky University Senate (Faculty Senate) meeting minutes, February 8, 1965 text University of Kentucky University Senate (Faculty Senate) meeting minutes, February 8, 1965 1965 1965-02-08 2020 true xt73ff3m0f1n section xt73ff3m0f1n    
 
 

  
     
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
    
   
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
   

‘ flu: ”NJ—q‘ fl'

(
i
I
I
f.
r

'1

a reoom-{
a fresh-3
Lderatim
next ,

 

ted to f
The

’ *~.—\r—-’— ‘

MINUTES OF THE UNIVERSITY FACULTY, FEBRUARY 8, 1965

The University Faculty met in regular session at 4:00 p.m., Monday,
February 8, 1965, in the Student Centre Theatre. Chairman Weaver presided.

The minutes of January ll, 1965 were approved as circularized.

The Secretary of the Faculty read a note of appreciation from Dr.
Kuiper and his family.

Dr. Thomas D. Clark presented for the Graduate Faculty a recommendation
that honorary degrees be conferred on three persons at the Centennial
celebration on Founder's Day, February 22, 1965. The names of the three
persons were approved by the Faculty for transmittal to the Board of
Trustees with the request that the names not be revealed until the Board
has taken action and the nominees have accepted. Dr. Clark also stated
that these three names did not constitute the full report of the Committee
on Honorary Degrees and that the remainder of the report would be presented
at a later time.

Dean Shaver presented resolutions on the death of Professor J. S. Horine
as submitted and approved by the College of Engineering with the recommenda—
tion that they be spread upon the minutes of the University Faculty and
c0pies be sent to his family. The Chairman asked the Faculty to stand in
a moment of silent tribute in acceptance of the resolutions.

Resolution on the Death of John Sherman Horine

On December 21, 1964, there was suddenly taken from us one
of the most beloved and respected "old timers" of the faculty of
the College of Engineering. "Old timer” only in years of faith—
ful and dedicated service, John Sherman Horine, even in retirement,
continued his sincere interest in the College and the University of
Kentucky.

Upon graduation from the College in 1909 he left for a posi~
tion in industry but, after a year, he heeded the call of his
Alma Mater and returned as Instructor in Mechanical Drawing.
Through deserved promotions he became Professor of Engineering
Drawing and for many years was also Advisor to and Co—ordinator
of Engineering Freshmen.

In this latter capacity ”Prof” Horine, by his unselfish
assistants, helped many a young student on his way to a successful
career.

As a teacher, John Sherman Horine excelled. His methods
were kindly but firm and over the years thousands of students
left his classes with a clearer understanding of one of the
fundamentals of engineering, ~ the language of graphics. Besides
teaching, he found time to generously help others by making
drawings and layouts which were unique in their artistic appearance
as well as Correct in detail.

He loved the outdoors and in his hobbies of gardening and
fishing he spent many happy hours.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ,4

' _".‘_’.“'\u n . .

   
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
   

MINUTES OF THE UNIVERSITY FACULTY, FEBRUARY 8, 1965

51} Resolution on the Death of John Sherman Horine (continued)

' .

One of his outstanding characteristics was his talent for let- {
tering. Mementos of this lettering carried by numerous students
and still treasured by thousands of alumni are slide rule cases (
with their names prominent on the side in Old English or special {
;5 ‘q. ‘ "swingy" letters done by the master's hand. The same is true of
§‘§€§E.: at" various engineering certificates, and plaques also numbering in [
it ”Eilmyfl the thousands. '

 

 

 

 

 

,ityv*“ Other examples of John Sherman Horine's talent and devotion
211‘? to his work are the two hand lettered lists of Kentucky war dead,

,-1111 y..: 2,809 names from the first World War mounted in Memorial Hall and ,

V Eff g1 ‘f ii 9,265 names from World War II along the concourses of Memorial Coliseum.

“ngf4; 21.5 One of these was that of John Sherman Horine, Jr.

 

On none of the above nor on any of the many other lettered
posters, scrolls and announcements did his signature appear but
his unique style and unselfish willingness to do for others will
be remembered for years to come.

 

 

 

 

 

John Sherman Horine, in life, set an example to be envied.
He was a devoted husband and father and had a sincere interest
in his church. His many old friends were dear to him and he
had a wonderful capactiy for making new ones. His place in the
University and in the hearts of his associates here can never be
filled. With his passing a tradition of the school passes - a
tradition that will always be an inspiration to those who were
fortunate enough to know him. (

-fifix _

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“.f“‘-._4 ——-»v. ——“.

 

 

 

 

 

Now therefore, be it resolved that the Faculty of the College
of Engineering does hereby officially express its appreciation for'
gapyy the long and valued services of John Sherman Horine, its love and
W? fl admiration for him in life and its deep sorrow and loss at his

t passing. (

\ ' r‘ 4 A.‘__V

 

 

I ‘35.

t?‘ It is the wish of this Faculty that this resolution be placed

Wt?” in the minutes of the University Faculty and that a copy be sent ;
to his family with deepest sympathy from each member. ,

 

l

1 .

j7.‘ The Secretary of the University Faculty Council presented the following

‘ ‘ reports to the Faculty: (

3 Et‘ that the following officers have been appointed to the University Faculty
‘tfl f‘ Council effective January 1, 1965 through December 51, 1965:

 

Edmund D. Pellegrino, Chairman
1 H Stephen Diachun, Vice Chairman
3 ? William S. Ward, Secretary; i

 

 

 

that further consideration by the Rules Committee and Faculty Council of the
change in admissions requirements for all out~of~state freshmen applicants

as recommended in the circularization to the University Faculty by the '
Rules Committee under date of December 28, 1964 had shown a need for further t
it investigation of its effect on programs and policies of the University, and'mfl'
with the consent and approval of the Rules Committee the University Faculty
Council was withholding recommendation on the rules change until all factors
involved can be given adequate consideration.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 --_..fi,‘ 2" ‘ Wr—xy

w“,— i ._ ‘_

“1,—51 _“,___~ - x- _,

*‘\/—\_,

MINUTES OF THE UNIVERSITY FACULTY, FEBRUARY 8, 1965

The Secretary of the Faculty Council presented recommendation from the
Rules Committee for the establishment of the following standing committee
of the University Faculty. The Faculty approved this committee as presented.

University Faculty Advisory Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics

The University Faculty Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics
shall consist of the members of the faculty of the University who
are members of the Board of Directors of the Athletics Association.
The Committee shall be charged with reporting annually to the
University Faculty on aspects of the intercollegiate athletics
policies that may be related to the academic policies of the
University.

Dr. Ward presented a recommendation from the Faculty Council to dismiss
classes February 22, Founder‘s Day, effective at the beginning of the eleven
o'clock class period. This recommendation was approved by the Faculty.

Dean Matthews presented recommendation from the College of Law that the
candidates who had completed requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Laws
on December 19, 1964 be approved. The Faculty concurred in the recommendation.

Tommy Wayne Chandler, Dixon

Ralph Lovell Collins, Lexington

Wilbur Earl Dean, Jr., Harrodsburg

Paul Edward Fagan, Richmond

C Thomas Greene, Lexington

Marvin Lee Henderson, Lexington

Carol Winfield Johnson, Kirkmansville
Sidney Clay Kinkead, Jr., Lexington

Paul Liston Madden, Lexington

William Lee Marshall, Lexington

William Chenault Morton, Princeton
Luther Nilson Norene, Pleasure Ridge Park
Charles Lowell Quindry, Lexington
Frederick Irwin Rosenberg, Frankfort
Shelton Marshall Saufley, Richmond

Elias Henry Tingle, Jr., Frankford, Delaware
Paul K. Turner, Dawson Springs

Eberhard Frederick Zopp, Lexington

Professor Clements presented a recommendation from the School of Home
Economics to waive the rule which prohibits a student carrying more than
nine credit hours in a Summer Session in order that Karen Marie Hanks might
Obtain her degree at the May 1965 Commencement. The University Faculty
approved waiver of the rule in the case of Miss Hanks.

At the request of the Faculty Council Dr. Hartley Eckstrom presented a
report on the procedures being followéd by the four area academic committees.
He stated that these committees were formed for the purpose of establishing
a uniform policy throughout the University for recommendation of appointments,
promotions, and tenure to the President; that in order for these committees
to function properly the department chairman should prepare

   
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

. . v: . . ,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MINUTES OF THE

 
 
   
  
   
   
 
   
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
 
 

UNIVERSITY FACULTY, FEBRUARY 8, 1965

_l. Biographical information which contains education and experience,
with dates

2. List of publications, with copies

3. Statements from tenure departmental members for new appointments,
showing agreement or disagreement, with reasons. Statements
from tenure departmental members whose grade is the same or
higher than the man being recommended for promotion or granting
of tenure with reasons for approval or disapproval

4. Letters from three persons outside the University who are capable
of judging the professional competence of the individual and who have
been furnished copies of publications and other pertinent information

5. Statement from the Dean of the College approving the promotion.

Dr. Eckstrom stated that this file goes to the President and then to the
appropriate Area Committee; that each file is examined prior to a meeting of
the Committee and that decision is reached at the Committee meeting on whether
or not an ad hoc committee should be appointed The Area Committee recommends
the membership of the ad hoc committee to the President to consist of not less
than three nor more than five members. Dr. Eckstrom stated that careful con—
sideration had brought the conclusion that the ad hoc committee should remain
confidential as it was felt that very few peOple would wish to be placed in the
position of openly evaluating the professional stature of a colleague and
friend. He stated that this committee is empowered to telephone or write
anyone for information; that it submits its recommendation, reasons, infor—
mation accumulated by its search, and both Opinions if agreement is not reached,
to the Area Committee; that the Area Committee recommendation to the President
contains its recommendation, together with the complete file from the ad hoc
committee; that if the Opinion of the Area Committee is not unanimous, both
views are carefully stated, with reasons; and that the Area Committee recommemk
and the President decides. Dr. Eckstrom stated that if all the material re—
quested in the above five listings has been properly assembled, the normal

case is completed in a week to ten days.

Appreciation was extended to Dr. Eckstrom for his report.
The Faculty adjourned at 4:40 p.m.

Charles F. Elton
Secretary