xt78930ntd1q https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt78930ntd1q/data/mets.xml   Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station. 1969 journals 177 English Lexington : Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Kentucky Contact the Special Collections Research Center for information regarding rights and use of this collection. Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station Progress report (Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station) n.177 text Progress report (Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station) n.177 1969 2014 true xt78930ntd1q section xt78930ntd1q  
eh Results of the
.; KENTUCKY HYBRID CORN
9 PERFORMANCE TEST — 1968
  Q_ Q_ Ponelegt * PROGRESS Raven 177
(T'} K. O. EVGHS JANUARY 1969
G8 ·
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY • AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
_; DEPARTMENT OF AGRONOMY • LEXINGTON
I'? ,I.V1» M ,   ,.I,    
Q  V Tygk   v_   7
 I   t“é_ __   ·‘'*   ·
      5  g A   `’=-7 §    
        é      7      \
  `6`   $ **    
    if ‘   vi  
    I Iirr       22  
’   A ` I   ··" 2*; j%  `
IIZI   ·     7   I g ~     z~~    
I   I     IFI, Q   A       *
      A   R   V Ng?    
I          J?   A  "
    LIA A     ~ ; I 7 I  Q    I
‘   ·   I;6`     °   I     /»7,  A ';7;-  
 A   I A I     A Z      I {‘‘ <    
  I     I   7 ’ "    -~7  
w ,/  ;   7;,    1 I . ¤ ‘ Q V ,  

 Fi
TESTING LOCATIONS OF THE 1968 Z
KENTUCKY HYBRID CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS
X
9
ES?
W6   Ԥ%w ' R
  \M».=.rau:»   Yea
@  _  ¤/-mann %    Q
g  w   agro  wi —
$ ¤&·““·a @~a   K ‘ A
a @£‘@%@ EAKEKH §Wa@&¢»¤"“ ·
‘ ` ‘ ` - >  
im 1  °"“ ·»*’  mf Q  l
.  ha 5 M Nggg; See Table 3 for exacthfest l0cati0¤5
I,
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Acknowledgments are made to Mr. Gary Hicks and 4
Mr. John Byers, Department of Agronomy, for assistance '
in sum arizing the results presented in this progress ‘
report. Also acknowledgments are made to the following p
persons who aided in the conduct of this year's per- .
formance test. I ‘
Shirley Phillips, State Grains Specialist, Lexington, Ky. :
Charles Tutt, Research Specialist, Princeton, Ky.
Paul Appel, Station Superintendent, Princeton, Ky.
C. E. Wyatt, Area Extension Agent, Mayfield, Ky.
Stuart Brabant, Area Extension Agent, Henderson, Ky.
John Kavanaugh, Area Extension Agent, Hartford, Ky.
Clifton Taylor, Area Extension Agent, Franklin, Ky.
George Armstrong, Station Superintendent, Quicksand, Ky. 9
2

 *1
“ LIST OF TABLES
; 1. Hybrids Tested in 1968.
6 2. Pedigrees of Experiment Station Hybrids Tested in _
1968.
EK 3. Agronomic Information Pertaining to 1968 Test 4
_ Locations.
2 Q. Annual Summary, Normal Population, Lowes, Ky.
5. Annual Summary, Normal Population, Princeton, Ky.
6. 2-Year Summary, Normal Population, Princeton, Ky.
' 7. 3-Year Sum ary, Normal Population, Princeton, Ky.
8. Annual Sum ary, Normal Population, Henderson, Ky.
w 9. Annual Summary, Normal Population, Hartford, Ky.
10. 2—Year Summary, Normal Population, Hartford, Ky.
ll. 3—Year Summary, Normal Population, Hartford, Ky.
‘ 12. Annual Summary, Normal Population, Franklin, Ky.
13. Annual Summary, Normal Population, Lexington, Ky.
14. 2-Year Summary, Normal Population, Lexington, Ky.
, 15. 3-Year Sum ary, Normal Population, Lexington, Ky. `
16. Annual Summary, Normal Population, Quicksand, Ky.
· 17. Annual Summary, Normal Populations, All Non—Virus
f Locations.*
_ 18. Annual Summary, High Population, Princeton, Ky.
19. 2—Year Summary, High Population, Princeton, Ky.
20. 3—Year Summary, High Population, Princeton, Ky.
‘ 21. Annual Sum ary, High Population, Lexington, Ky.
22. 2—Year Summary, High Population, Lexington, Ky.
¥: 23. 3-Year Summary, High Population, Lexington, Ky.
2Q. Annual Summary, High Population, Princeton and
Lexington, Ky.
25. Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus Test, Normal Population,
Q Frankfort, Ky.
‘»
K
` * Quicksand Included
3
r

 :q>
RESULTS OF THE KENTUCKY HYBRID CORN _
PERFORMANCE TEST IN 1968 S
I
C. G. Poneleit and K. O. Evans ,
5
INTRODUCTION 2
The information presented in this progress report is intended
to provide farmers, seedsmen and other interested persons with un-
' biased performance estimates of hybrid seed corn sold in Kentucky.
Although the general objective of the 1968 test is the same as
past years, changes have been made which will hopefully increase *
the usefulness to all concerned.
A most noticeable change is the substitution of mechanical
planting and harvesting for hand methods. The intent of this _
change is to provide procedures which resemble, as closely as
possible, the actual procedures used by farmers. An equal number
of kernels was planted for each hybrid at a particular population `
so that a hybrid's field germination and survival fitness would be
evaluated under actual growing conditions. The grain was harvested _
by machine with no gleaning of dropped ears. Only grain picked up
and passed through the harvesting equipment contributed to yield.
Therefore, yields shown in the tables reflect the hybrid's ability —
to germinate and survive through the growing season, its resistance
to lodging and diseases, and its harvestability as well as its in-
herent ability to produce grain. Other important changes are the
selection of hybrids to be included in the test, the number of
hybrids included, and the number of testing locations. These al- Q .
terations assure an adequate sampling of available corn hybrids
and of soil and climatic variation in the state.
TESTING PROCEDURE _
Selection of Entries _
The 6Q hybrids shown in table l were selected from those `
being marketed in Kentucky. An asterisk (*) identifies several P
new hybrids that will be available for the first time in 1969. The
hybrids to be included were recommended by two independent groups:
(l) a com ittee of farmers with broad interests throughout the
state and (2) the hybrid corn companies. The final choices
9.
1+

 *1
were made by the testing personnel and state grains specialist.
h Seed for planting was obtained by test personnel from local seed
"” dealers throughout the state. The hybrids listed in table l rep-
_L_ resent those hybrids grown on the majority of Kentucky's corn
acreage.
r Location of Tests
p In 1968, tests were conducted in eight different soil or ‘
climatic areas of the state. The map at the beginning of this
* report shows the location and table 3 presents pertinent agrgngmic
data for each location. Five test sites were located in the wes-
AC tern section of the state and three in the eastern section. Three
of the sites were on University of Kentucky research farms and five
l in farmers' fields. At two locations, Princeton and Lexington,
both a normal and high population test were grown.
The Frankfort location was specifically chosen because of
the presence of maize dwarf mosaic virus, a disease which threatens
_ corn production in certain parts of the state. The Quicksand lo-
cation had an unforeseen but mild infestation of m.d.m.v. Also
$1 unforeseen was the heavy infestation of leaf blight at the Hender-
son location. Although ratings for leaf blight were not made,
- varietal resistance to this disease is indicated by the hybrid's
ability to yield under these conditions.
Obviously, every soil and climatic condition is not repre-
' sented but with the limitations of time and resources the selected
locations do an adequate job of sampling the major corn growing
K areas.
Cultural Practices
For all locations, ground was broken and worked to prepare
a good seedbed by conventional tillage procedures. Fertilizer was
l applied as indicated by soil tests. Herbicides were used for weed
control and supplemented with post emergence cultivation when nec-
¥5 essary. Table 3 shows the specific fertilizer and herbicide treat-
ments for each location.
Experimental Design
Uncontrollable variability owing to minor variation of soil
type, fertility and other factors was sampled by using three rep-
“ lications of an 8 x 8 balanced lattice. A separate randomization
was employed for each location. The data presented in tablvS Q
R
5
I'

 t
rv
through 25 have been adjusted for block and replication differences
when shown applicable by statistical analyses.
Planting `
A11 plots were planted with a conventional four—row corn planter;
modified for small plot work. Special planting heads replaced normal
planter plates and boxes to permit clean-out after planting each p1o$
row. Each hybrid plot consisted of 3 side-by-side rows. The 2 outer-
rows bordered the middle row from competetive effects of neighboring -
hybrids and were not used for collection of data. Row width at all
locations was 38 inches. Population was varied by altering combina-
tions of row length and number of kernels planted per row. A pro-
cedure more representative of farmer practices, uniformity of depth
and spacing, and convenience to the testing personnel are advantages *
of this new procedure over the old hand planting technique. A
Harvesting
All plots were harvested with a conventional tractor-mounted, X
one-row picker-sheller. Each middle row of the 3-row hybrid plot was
picked, shelled, and the grain collected in a burlap sack. The
weight and moisture content of the grain from each plot were then
recorded. Acre yields were calculated and adjusted to No. 2 corn .
at 15.5% moisture. Only grain picked up by the harvesting equip- `
ment appears in the yield column of the tables since plots were ;‘
not gleaned for dropped or missed ears.
Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus
At Frankfort and Quicksand, m.d.m. ratings were made on all ·
hybrids. The ratings presented in Tables 16 and 25 will be of use
when selecting hybrids for areas where this disease is prevalent.
As indicated by the severity of the ratings, m.d.m.v. infestation 5
was much heavier at Frankfort than at Quicksand. At Frankfort,
animal pests destroyed the grain of many entries; therefore, grain _
yield data was not collected in 1968. However virus ratings from
the 1968, 1967 and 1966 tests as well as grain yields from the _
1967 test are presented in Table 25. In general, yield of a hybrid
is positively correlated with the m.d.m. rating as can be seen from
the 1967 data. _
6
6 x

  
¤
RESULTS
4~
_ Tables 4 through 25 present the results of the 1968 Kentucky
I*’ Hybrid Corn Performance Test. The heading of each table describes
c. the number of years data included in the table, the plant popula-
~ tion and the location of the test. The Princeton, Hartford and _
Lexington locations have 2- and 3-year sum aries as well as annual
summaries. For each table where more than one year's data is in-
•· cluded in the averages, plant population has varied from year to
year. In 1966 and 1967 plots were overplanted and thinned to
-; 17,42Q and 23,232 plants per acre for the normal and high popula-
tion, respectively. In 1968, approximately 20,000 and 26,YOO
kernels were planted per acre to constitute the normal and high
populations. The plots were not thinned in 1968. The percent
' stand indicated in each annual table, when multiplied by the num-
ber of kernels planted per acre, will give the actual plant popu-
lation for that hybrid. A percent stand less than 100 would
indicate some loss of plants owing to incomplete germination, seed-
n ling diseases or other factors. A stand reduction of 15% is not
uncommon for most hybrids.
_ Although the data collected in different years HTG not entirely
comparable the results have been pooled since averages over years
are generally more reliable than a single year's data. In future
bulletins this problem will be eliminated.
I
p It is not the purpose of this bulletin to recommend particular
° varieties, but rather to provide unbiased test results of hybrids
grown under common conditions. When using these test results to
A rate hybrids, the reader should consider in addition to relative
yielding ability, the hybrid's ability to produce good stands, to
withstand lodging, to rggjgt disease and its maturity. Data
__ for these factors are also listed in the tables. However, the
reader should remember that these factors have already entered into
_ the yield column since each factor makes either a positive or neg-
`b ative contribution to final grain yield.
Comparisons between yields or other characters of any two or
more hybrids should be made only with data from one table at a time.
The testing procedures employed in this test do not allow compari-
~~ sons such as a hybrid grown at one location and population with
' another hybrid grown at a different location and population.
`Q
* 7

 Q
F4`
Table l. Hybrids Tested in 1968
Hybrid Color Cross** Source of Hybrid t
Crib Filler 66 Yellow 2X Mitchell Farms §
105 ” 2X Windfall, Ind. V
123 " Ax 7
183W White ax
Dekalb XL3h2 Yellow 3X Dekalb Agricultural
XL3&6 " 3X Association
XL39OW White 3X De Kalb, Ill.
999W " ax '
XLQS Yellow 2X
XL66 " ZX
XL85 " 2X
Funk's G-438Q Yellow 2X Funk Bros. Seed Co.
G-Q595* " 3X 1300 W. Washington St.
G—4697 " 3X Bloomington, Ill. A
G~Q76l * " 3X
G-&83l White 2X za
G—5757 Yellow Ax
G-583OW White ax
K.A.E.S. Ky 105 Yellow ax Univ. of Kentucky
Ky 5921w White QX Agri. Exp. Sta.
Ky 65lQ Yellow ax Lexington, Ky.
Meacham's M -1OY Yellow 2X Meacham's Hybrids {Ki
M —5OW White 2X Route 3
MK-75W " 2X Morganfield, Ky.
P.A.G. SXl7 Yellow 2X Pfister Assoc. Growers `
SX29 " ZX Inc. Aurora, Ill.
SX3l " 2X
SXQ8 " 2X 5y`
SX52 " 2X
SXSOW White 2X
SX99 Yellow 2X
(continued)
E
8 v

 5
7 Table l (continued)
 
_ Hybrid Color Cross** Source of Hybrid
S·
_lV Pioneer 5llA White Ax Pioneer Corn Co.
3196 Yellow ZX Inc. Union City,
— 3306 “ ZX Tenn.
r 3308 " 3x ,
3369A " ZX
35AZ " 3X
¤ 356A ” 2X(Mod)
Q Princeton 920-A White Ax Princeton Farms
990-B* White Ax Princeton, Ind.
SX—803 Yellow 2x
p sx-80a Yellow ZX
Schenk S—96W White Ax Charles H. Schenk
· SS 75A Yellow 3x & Son, Route A
,_ SS—77A Yellow 3x Vincinnes, Ind.
V
,k Southern State 720 Yellow M  Southern States
' 820-S " 2x Coop, Inc. Div. of
J 860 " AX Seed & Farm Supply ,
866 " AX Richmond, Va.
( 935W White AX
’% Stew.Card. s—8A5 Yellow SX Stewart Hybrids,
SX39 " 2x Inc. Route l
2 SXA7 " 2X Princeville, Ind.
Z Stull's 500W White Ax Stull Bros. Inc.
707 Yellow ZX Sebree, Ky.
720* " 2x
_, 727* " 2x
8OOW White ZX
, 807A Yellow ZX
wi
Taylor—Evans E-20-Y-A " Ax Golden Acre Hybrids
M-Z0-W White Ax Taylor Evans Seed Co.
VR—ZO-Y Yellow Ax Tulia, Texas
Bonusmaker-S " ZX
• (continued)
2
} 9

 W
N
Table l (continued) ~
 
Hybrid Color Cross** Source of Hybrid 6
W.O.King & Son K60 White ax W.O. King & Son *
Hopkinsville, Ky.
>
* Hybrids available for the first time in 1969, may be
available in limited quantities only.
** 2X = Single Cross, 3X = Three—way Cross, ax = Double A
Cross. rw'
M  or SX = Multiple or Special Cross.
x
Table 2. Pedigrees of Experiment Station Hybrids ;,
Tested in 1968
Hybrid Color Cross Pedigree ·(
Ky 105 Yellow ax (T8 x CI2lE) -
(38-11 x Oh 7B)
Q
Ky 592lW White ax (CI6Q x 33-16)
(Ky 201 x CI66)
Ky 651b Yellow ax (HQ9 x B37)
(CI21E xCl03)
_____________________________________________________ ;c‘
Q
Q
10 5

 '*t
Ul
JJ
O.) Ul
° 3: 2 .,,3.. J
.E www >·5 ’U·D
,3 r><¤--4 <¤¤I-4 ·-Inns.:
U cn.-ln'-I ¤32> ZZl>
*5 .-I co cx -4 N ¢¤ U UIUU U UIUU U UCUU I UKUU
» TAD O O O O O O O O O O O ‘
I
Q ¤D GO I\ xc .-4
C2 ~. >xC·'¥>~· >~• E >~. Z>~· >~· >~.
_ GN N KUIUIU KU D {I1 IU K1 KU
N mn Z Z1 Z Z1 >-¤ >: it E1 E1
DJ
~.
GJJJ JJ JJ JJ JJ JJ JJ
C ll) wm mln {DUI {DID {DUI QJII1
.-Im I1 GK! Civ ¤r¤ IIN Ciw CGI
UE ·r-4'U ·»-IU ·»-4U -»-4U ·»-IU ·r-4U •rlU
¤-i·IJ NCD N’0 N*0 N*0 N*0 N*0 N*0
V1 K1 IU*0 {UG} {UIQ NIU RUR! Hifi! QJ NIU
C $·I¤J $-IG $-40 $-40 $-40 I-IO $-40 CI $-40
—‘§ O ~. me ¤D'UO :20 ·-40 xo O O 0
Q-4 E-I G.-T ¤·»·*»—`l <¤•-I IU.-I O.-`I .-1 I-4-J .-1
- ·r4 ·»-Im v—* *0 $-4 >~. D O
Q .—I --4JJ JJ*¤JJ QJJJ QJJ pu SJJJ OJJ »-4JJ
O ·.-4 v-I.-4 {:;:-4 ,x.-4 m»-4 E-4 :}.-4 Ea -.-4.-4
2.. --4 O O--4 :!·.-I--4 r¤·.J JJ--4 0.1·»-4 cv-.-4 L:·»-4 £·.-4
* g rn Um :¤»-Im 301 mm mm zu: ~.·O >~. >¤ · ·€U >~. >. JJ Z>` O
E CL O. ¥>~.·»-4 bd JZ >~.*0·-4 >"0 bd M YU M ·»-4
l O O E bdl-’ 4-4 >d¤»I MI': vn ’¤¤3 JJ
CZ O ·¤G * H1 •· IU GUQJ 3 ·· ·~¤ ·~C >.u¤ ¤¤¤ ¤ G ~ ,¤ ·· cm um.: ·¤¤JJ
M bd OJ-4vI O O ’U$-4¤. C4-4 O- $.4 0. Cm:/>
.,4 ¤D 'U rn JJ. ctn: UO
· · r: 3*w ·-*3 ¤·-, IJ3 mx xx mz -4.;
i` M 0 0 JJ 41: ru IJ 0 I-I :>
Q)   »-4 ¤-4 Z Z LY-4 $-7 $1-4 O
»—* FU
,.¤ U rx xx A A »-\ rx A xx
rc O -4 na M \·r In 0 v\ uc
[.4 ,4 xx v xx W V xx w w
 -
' 11

 ~¢
Table 9- Annual Summary, Normal Population `
Lowes, Ky. L
Yield Z Moist Z Lodging Z "
Hybrid Bu/A at Harv Root Stalk Stand *
Yellow `
P.A.G. SX48 50.1 14.7 20.7 11.8 87.5
Stewart Card 3-845 86.2 15.0 3.6 11.7 88.5
Funk's G-4384 120.7 15.1 4.5 8.2 86.5 ,
Pioneer 3542 122.2 15.1 0.0 4.9 85.4 Al
Dekalb XL45 130.9 15.3 0.0 2.2 93.7 tf‘
P.A.G. SX52 119.3 15.3 5.8 1.1 93.7
P.A.G. SX31 134.7 15.4 1.4 2.3 84.4
Dekalb XL346 77.7 15.5 0.0 1.4 62.5
T—E Bonusmaker-S 113.9 15.6 2.7 2.6 83.3
Stewart Card.SX39 101.0 15.8 0.0 1.1 91.7
Dekalb XL66 127.8 16.0 0.0 0.0 88.5
S.S.720 150.4 16.2 1.0 3.2 97.9 i
P.A.G. SX17 154.9 16.3 0.0 3.5 93.7 ;t
Pioneer 3564 113.3 16.3 0.0 1.2 80.2
Stu11's 707 129.9 16.3 0.0 1.2 86.5 _
Dekalb XL342 115.5 16.3 0.0 1.2 89.6
Schenk SS-77A 113.9 16.5 3.8 4.5 84.4
Stewart Card.SX47 143.7 16.5 2.1 3.3 97.9 *
P.A.G. SX29 146.1 16.9 0.0 1.1 93.7
Funk's G—4595 101.7 16.9 0.0 3.2 75.0 ¤_
S.S. 820S 135.5 17.1 40.4 0.0 85.4
Stu11's 727 127.6 17.1 1.1 3.6 81.3
Princeton SX-803 151.8 17.3 0.0 1.1 93.7
Meacham's M -10Y 135.2 17.5 0.0 1.0 92.7 `
Schenk SS—75A 98.8 17.5 0.0 9.5 72.9 ¢
T—E VR-20-Y 125.6 17.6 2.1 3.2 94.8 ,
T—E E-20-Y-A 132.6 17.7 5.0 1.2 79.2 if
Pioneer 3369A 151.1 17.8 0.0 1.3 79.2 a
Princeton SX—804 141.7 17.9 0.0 0.0 84.4
Funk's G-4697 133.2 18.1 1.2 2.2 87.5 .
S.S. 860 135.4 18.3 18.5 2.8 82.3
Stu11's 807A 147.0 18.4 0.0 0.0 91.7 7
Dekalb XL85 138.7 18.5 0.0 0.0 80.2 e
Crib Filler 123 134.7 18.5 10.6 5.9 88.5
Crib Filler 105 157.2 18.5 0.0 4.3 95.8
(continued) .
12 ’

 ga
$15
v Table 4 (continued)
,_ Yield Z Moist Z Lodging Z
`* Hybrid Bu/A at Harv Root Stalk Stand
J
Ky 105 95.9 18.6 2.7 1.3 64.6
i Pioneer 3308 137.7 18.6 0.0 1.4 81.2 '
Crib Filler 66 176.0 18.7 10.6 2.1 97.9
‘ Pioneer 3196 161.3 18.8 0.0 3.3 91.7
»~ Stu11's 720 145.9 18.9 0.0 3.7 99.0
Pioneer 3306 129.2 19.0 0.0 3.8 87.5
.i S.S.866 136.7 19.0 0.0 1.2 84.4
Funk's G-5757 110.1 19.0 2.0 4.2 81.2
Ky 6514 133.9 19.8 9.9 1.1 94.8
. P.A.G. SX99 146.7 20.2 8.9 2.3 92.7
` Funk's G—4761 125.1 20.9 0.0 0.0 92.7
q Yellow Average 128.2 17.3 3.45 2.8 87.0
»_,_ White
' Ky 5921W 143.7 18.1 3.2 2.2 91.7 ·
" W.O.King & Son K60 148.6 18.5 1.1 3.6 88.5
S.S. 935W 146.5 18.5 1.1 2.4 90.6
T-E M-20W 126.3 18.5 11.1 1.2 89.6
i Schenk S-96W 141.9 18.6 0.0 0.0 86.5
Crib Filler 183W 142.3 18.7 5.6 1.2 92.7
F Stu11's 500W 131.0 18.7 7.1 4.6 90.6
. Dekalb XL 390W 142.6 19.1 6.4 0.0 81.2
Princeton 920-A 126.3 19.2 0.0 3.5 89.6
Dekalb 999W 142.9 19.3 2.5 2.6 83.3
Princeton 990-B 138.8 19.9 2.2 8.3 88.5
5 Meacham's MX-75W 134.1 20.1 4.0 1.0 94.8
Meacham's M -50W 130.9 20.2 7.3 3.3 95.8
-" Stu11's 800W 130.8 20.8 2.9 0.0 97.9
. Funk's G-5830W 145.0 21.0 0.0 6.0 86.5
P.A.G. SX80W 166.8 21.4 0.0 1.2 86.5
' Funk's G—4831 121.9 22.0 0.0 6.8 62.5
_Q Pioneer 511A 164.3 22.1 2.2 2.3 90.6
P
4 White Average 140.3 19.7 3.2 2.8 88.2
GRAND AVERAGE 131.6 18.0 3.4 2.8 87.3
i 13

 9
"¤ I
C'. |\ x0 \.D _
•-4 DDQ) .-4 .-4 ·
EL E
O ,..]1.I ©Q'©Q‘(3€DC>
Caml-4 4·’
Z|\·r-{M I!\··*<4‘¤»-4 JJ r—|<\I(\I('\1l\1(\|£\|(\|<\1C\ll\1(\lC\|<'\1<\|<\1<\| (\I <\1l`1C*lC\Il\|C\|(\lL\I <\l <\I Q
H N4}
EIA
:h4g¢ \DU\<"7<"7K!©; O\l!'\@<\l\.|’\43¤\<¢1»-4¤\c3O\0O‘\O0.-• <;> .-4.-4.-4.-4OOC7\O¤O O
}.|O>4 v-|»-4.-ln-Iv-4 .-4.-4 .-4 »-4 .—lr-4.-4 I-l v-lv-ir-|y—(»-in-| .-4 »-I
{UU
GJCU VJ F7 Q' 3 3
>•u •r\ Our`. m O M 4 In
IC $-|<<: ..-4 .-4 . ~.¤ no .-4 0 I cu g.;
in xc/n4\ ~¤ >< *0 < <¤ 3 N §i3 GD U `
Q-4 <¤ I\ O mI.4G'\$.4r\r>-4 vn $-4 $-4 I-4¤D ON O rv §
E·n <·‘1 cv.-4¤JO>-In cu uz <1>O\ O $-4
¢n·¤c/umm ¤.-4r¤.—4o¤¤O G .-4 > ··*¤33¤ moo ru Ld *·
· :!$·4mO C>Or-i ¤-·* ON 0*0** ¢ **01*0003* P >
4.0 Em z\1$·4¤Du—.-4;-4-.4wNI uxD·.-4 -.-I mmu.-4Em 4 4
·¤30<.J.x¤0<1:¤omr.¤.wr;.-¤:z4nwmL=. 3 Lr-4,:dG'\|€UNr¤-
su ·.-40¤:·¤ cu o zu .-4¤J>Oo 0 GJ ¤ 5;;:04.::.-4 m Q bln
r—* $-4*** 3<`U'C'¤.-DI:.-¤·‘* ¤—*IZ'.·.-D "* U-DW ' ¤U’\~,L1)IlJU··r|•LJ}.A·r|l»·44JII>»)·| •)-4 QJ .C.'$»4U•IL|>~.QJ$J JZ
E-4 ¤>-·Hv1mm£14cn¤.4<.J¤.·<.>rn&4E—¢>d¤-4 >¤ 3Uu¤mH¤-4>0O¤O¤Ow-4 .-4 .-4.-4.-4 .-4 .-4 .-.-4 .-4.-4.-4 .-.-4.-4.-4.-4.-4
  `
mu
*-*41) VW U) F7
{UU Q CN I O I\ (*7 Q
:!¤ GO M $-4 00 <2 w n<4 .-4 4 In
Cn an <\1d|\U)CT\® xOu·1»D¤‘~ 4
¢D4 ® ··**|\* N {/1|\ ~O©$·l(U><><<'W<'\,.`|I\>¢><®¥:U)’Uf'1r’\»-4,.1{;')<'1l ®,JI\
· mi-4mm >< mz/>Ux-4<~4 0:1 c\1Oms-4 »-•>l.J;£lf\f\O,D D.¥L}QJGJ[l.4.D.$CL)I/1CD* .D’ _
1: -<¤.-4.-4l.'JQ.¤— ·>O rn.-4 u¤·mm .-4¤¤»— -.--4
—· L---4-:·-¤¤<¤·-4--xB -4- ¤·¤w3¤¤.¤mu¤.x·—4¤-4
.¤ .¤.-44c»<:;40O.:¢¤<£<¤¤¤JuJ mm.!m·.-4.::d:l
<¤ Q.4.•...-4-.-4\·¤c1-I.4uu·.-4~-4».•¤:··¤.:n¤·¤4¢1.¤.~¤m¤..¤4L¤vnE—•>dcnE-4¤:n¤4mm¤4D4U¤m¤4L¤:nmQu; -
\

 di
Lb
- 'U
tl l!W\D®I\®U\U\I\O\ r\cOOl\¤Ox¤ Ch N
§4J @l\|f"\lf\v·*Lf'\C)OOC>C)v-I NOONCDO l\| v—*
¤Ud)§’O OOOCDOOOOO OOCDOOO O O '
EMO nd
~ $-41
OI\
Z`? *.25 ‘
VA •~\.O ·-lg -4 .-4
1cu M <|§
(DE CD CO ~D GJ Q)!
_ $-4-1-4 1 1 40 cb 1-40 CU L1.]
( sn >< <1>< K! N3 3 ¤D U
[-1D-4 Ul U') H H $·J¤\\O O KU §
>| QJ CU GJ 0* C) $-1
mg: uci -4 ;> 3.-1;:1 co cu BJ
·§ · c>0000¤0.-4 4 cz-40:/1*3 > >
1\ NJJxDc\1·1Jx.¤·»-4 N-.-lu -44/1 ¢ <¤
*1:} 3¤O¤J1¤J¤OLr-MDB 1L¤sCU·}-¢·l$·:·$·4L>~.GJ.~.1J.!Z·'
V E-4 ¤ :>-¤<.¤¤4v1[-4¤-·u¤LJ:¤d:>•B[—4LJ¤4v:::<¤¤ 3 LD
`
l!\€"»<\1I'\C)|\U\OU'\O\U1<\|Lf\®O'\ &O~D|\<"1C7\\Tf'1<\I<\I®C$\<\1U\»-4
r-4 v—| r-4 1-41-4 r-lr-41-J 1-lv-4 1-I 1-4 v-I1-4
F3 <"`» ~D
OOOOONOOOOOOOOO ©CD©Ov·*©C)CDCJ©©OOOO<*70v—¢C>OO©OC>OOC)O¤-¢OC)Cz O
g  Ch
O\O'\U\O\G'\O\C>OOO(DOC)r·*U\G"\D· 3 3 "
c> mo man 4: 0 171
at @4) O** QJ O CDI I 31./1 f\
<:r\ 10 .-41 »-4r\ DD @(3 -4O O O1 ,-43 1 :11 L1.]
»c:~ >.< ~¤ é om cu M33 cm N mES<;m<>3c·~_q¤0 gp
>4xD mum $.1 Qr\r\1¤¤‘·s.1 _O~D3 L-sch O’~OcO,_·-4c0C7\OAr·J §
I`? 011-4 Q) t'~lr\11,.1><;> O1.r·11G~33·-4;: ¤><:1m1n1,.`|¤>v1¤) 11.1
NcJ»¤0··-4 -4- LDU>LD- L>>< - > >
1 \¤.1.1.,-41.1q»-V-4Em rn z~1z··>·»-4u-4u Ep mE4 4]
Lx.]!/J®<1JLL4<1)v-<[z.,l<1-KID!/1.-D*3 ¤6'.-‘¢..D1O'¤D’-4¤)C\lGJ·VJ!¤GJlD.D—G
- u cum .:.‘·-4--·-*l.’JO<1» -4:-4: u¤*ULD—.:¤1--4-4.:0 Q
x·¤.¤¤~O..¤¤-·.x,:~¤m·-4u¤n-wm ·,¤¤m¤·;¢u¤.~¢<¤-ou Z
BJC!/)·»-|·»-*0 —r¢¤JDCE.£»$~lGJUDD¤J·QJ.C•HUUOl·L4¥4>~.$-4·D1`LJ·»—¢:!<2L)1-*Q•..l1'
Hr.¤u>¤4U¤4>¢Uzm¤4l¤¤¤· >·'.z>dmv>Q[-4u>L>¤4>¢¤4¤1¤1z¤1L¤Qmz3 ng
*2
y 15

   A
ir:
Table 8. Annual Summary, Normal Population ~y
Henderson, Ky.
Yield Z Moist Z Lodging _
Hybrid Bu/A at Harv Root Stalk Stand '
Yellow J
Stewart Card.S-845 65.8 16.2 0.0 22.8 71.9 ·
P.A.G. SX48 40.6 16.2 0.0 58.0 71.9 V
P.A.G. SX17 80.6 16.6 0.0 0.0 52.1
P.A.G. SX31 99.4 16.7 1.4 5.2 65.6 .
Stewart Card.SX39 76.3 16.7 0.0 9.9 82.3
Stu11's 727 91.9 16.8 0.0 19.9 56.2 °
P.A.G. SX52 86.2 16.9 0.0 11.5 82.3
Funk's G—4384 115.6 17.2 0.0 4.1 77.1
Pioneer 3564 101.5 17.4 0.0 0.0 79.2
P.A.G. SX29 109.4 17.5 0.0 9.3 81.2
Dekalb XL45 79.0 17.6 0.0 11.7 79.2 ¤
Pioneer 3542 97.1 17.8 0.0 2.7 74.0 L
Dékalb XL342 84.8 17.8 0.0 8.5 64.6 _
S.S. 720 117.0 18.0 0.0 19.6 94.8 *—
Dekalb 20.346 60.9 18.0 0.0 8.7 51.0
Ky 105 98.1 18.4 0.0 14.3 70.8 9
Stewart Card.SX47 114.5 18.4 1.4 1.4 61.5
T—E Bonusmaker-S 106.6 18.5 0.0 1.5 69.8
Princeton SX—803 109.9 18.7 0.0 2.9 74.0 e
Dekalb XL66 118.8 18.7 0.0 0.0 80.2
Schenk SS-77A 95.8 18.7 0.0 6.0 72.9 ‘~
S.S. 820S 110.2 18.8 0.0 1.2 76.0
S.S. 860 115.8 18.8 0.0 9.5 85.4
Schenk SS—75A 105.8 18.8 0.0 9.0 79.2 Q
Stu11's 707 95.0 18.9 0.0 1.2 72.9
Funk's G-4595 114.8 19.3 0.0 0.0 82.3 (
T-E VR—20-Y 110.0 19.4 0.0 1.3 70.8 .c
Funk's 6-4697 84.3 19.6 0.0 3.5 56.2
Stu11's 807A 119.9 19.8 0.0 1.4 78.1 `
Pioneer 3306 111.1 19.9 0.0 0.0 64.6
Pioneer 3369A 12r.3 20.0 0.0 0.0 84.4
Crib Filler 66 109.8 20.1 0.0 3.2 72.9 `
Meacham's M -10Y 109.3 20.2 0.0 3.9 82.3
Stu11's 720 105.7 20.2 0.0 0.0 68.8 #
Pioneer 3308 125.6 20.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 V
(continued)
V
16 7.

 ,~
. Table 8- (continued)
 
" Yield Z Moist Z Lodging Z
t Hybrid Bu/A at Harv Root Stalk Stand
>· Ky 651@ 129.7 20.3 1.3 @.0 79.2
Crib Filler 123 130.2 20.@ 0.0 3.5 71.9
i Crib Filler 105 106.2 20.@ 0.0 2.5 75.0
Princeton SX-80@ 128.2 20.5 0.0 3.1 61.5
S.S. 866 103.3 20.5 1.2 3.3 71.9 _
¤· Funk's G-5757 10@.5 20.7 0.0 3.3 80.2
Pioneer 3196 1@5.0 20.7 0.0 0.0 79.2 .
*5 Dekalb XL85 120.9 20.8 0.0 1.@ 68.7
T-E E-20-Y-A 112.7 21.3 0.0 2.5 77.1
P.A.G. SX99 101.1 21.9 0.0 @.0 78.1
A Funk's G-@761 109.8 22.0 0.0 0.0 87.5
Z Yellow Average l0@.1 19.0 0.12 6.1 73.6
" white
,_ S.S. 935W 128.9 19.3 0.0 6.9 78.1
4 Schenk S-96W 138.5 19.5 0.0 @.7 87.5
U Crib Filler 183W 115.@ 19.8 0.0 5.8 70.8
_ T-E M-20W 132.5 19.9 0.0 7.8 83.3
Princeton 920-A 117.6 20.1 0.0 1.3 72.9
v; Stu11's 500WC 123.2 20.3 0.0 @.2 70.8
W.0.King & Son K60 118.0 20.@ 0.0 8.0 65.6
_ F Ky 5921W 111.3 20.5 0.0 3.7 65.6
P.A.G. SX80W 117.9 20.6 0.0 9.0 77.1
5 Princeton 990-B 125.0 20.8 0.0 7.3 86.5
Meacham's M -50W 116.3 20.9 0.0 3.6 8@.@
" Meacham's M —75W 111.3 21.3 0.0 0.0 92.7
Dekalb 999W 107.6 21.@ 0.0 5.1 71.9
_ Pioneer 511A 120.2 21.6 0.0 @.6 67.7
q` Dekalb XL 390W 130.5 21.6 0.0 @.7 86.5
> Funk's G-5830W 98.1 21.8 0.0 9.@ 69.8
Stu11's 800W 101.5 21.9 0.0 0.0 62.5
Funk's G-@831 100.9 22.6 0.0 6.8 50.0
’ White Average 117.5 20.8 0.0 5.2 7@.7
~ _......__.__________________________________________,_______
‘ GRAND AVERAGE 107.8 19.5 0.08 5.8 73.9
`  
3
P• 17

 E \D<"'§®l!\<'\|¢ 114 ¤OxD‘·¤\D7` v—| f*'$r—¢<\|<\|v-|v—|©¤"* (N u·*
NH >-G ¤4»-|u**»—lp-1u—4•-4v·*-4v-4u-|¤-4¤-4v-·i»-4u-|»-I v-4 v-lr-lu-iu-4»—l»-Iv-4u-4 u-4 u-4
GJO
>4w rn M < f\ < FU 3 N 3 ¤0 O
KU>'* U) $·4f\}-I l@I\O\ (./)}-4 LA ND 5-4U\ O N g
Eu · mum >-4mO·-4 uu cu ON 411 O $-4
· m0 ’¤¤m»-4m»-4 ummm cir-4 > gu; »-ug':/ucc QJ Ld
O DFID}-|OC)r·*[Du·* O \DOu—* ¢ ©(/)\!\3u—|O— > >
v-4 CI\Om4J<'\|—u-| ·u-| <\|I-4V1$-l\Dl-J-A <\1 f"\u—*·u-(4-JEUI ¢ ¢ .
·¤3O§cOL>¤uL:u,:dLz4uhum- cuucwu. 3 u.;¢¤¤mL¤·~.QJII·U}·4•¥-4U}·l>~.l~y-{-\-'·r-|•$·4$·l CU .¤IU•>~.$-I}-4C|J4J ..E
[-4 :¤>-• 3E-4v1m:>dU¤.·zv1 3 0
A
*2 \J'\r\\!'\\h\L)&1)I\\OC'1l!\¢\OC}\\DI\®¤OI\l!\\.f`\\O\f\l\(\lC) ,.u»-¤ "_
3. ug f')J\Tt\I©»—4C)OSKVOCVGOFTCJC)OO©©©l\I<"7©C)v—|C)©O(\lO@(3