<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap">xt7c599z367f https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7c599z367f/data/mets.xml The Kentucky Kernel Kentucky -- Lexington The Kentucky Kernel 1981-04-16 Earlier Titles: Idea of University of Kentucky, The State College Cadet newspapers  English   Contact the Special Collections Research Center for information regarding rights and use of this collection. The Kentucky Kernel  The Kentucky Kernel, April 16, 1981 text The Kentucky Kernel, April 16, 1981 1981 1981-04-16 2020 true xt7c599z367f section xt7c599z367f Vol. LXXXIII, No.10 _ l‘niverslty of Kentucky
Thum.y9 April 16, 1981 3" Independent student nouns-p" Lexi“ '0", Ken‘uck I . .
*“e r *4: ' ’ ,
t l I I I I 3] «height “‘rmte‘hg ”hit; '. - '
e e a SO ”Emit “it“? “ewe! shaggy fifths? a,“ . > - ;
. 3‘13“» Stat this. n”: glare; ‘m-a- a“: , 5}} i; were? E9. .' ‘Lg‘f‘. r) Th. :5“; ,V ‘t' :’ t I it
9 the“ ere it“ 2- ' . : .
UK S Wolf pleceS together ngSly clues . ”t ‘* : ’i' :55: with ;:,«.:ff“=.~ . * , ' ’. ' '- ' w
From APand Staff Dispatches Wolf said he works on corpse iden- "That's him,’ H wolf recalled, "and . - "iii » , , a 3“ t " ' '- ‘ ‘- ~ L 2.... ¥ ' .
tification as his schedule permits we looked at the nephew, and could .- .‘ 32.; ' ‘ - " , I ; .
CARROLLTON, Ky. - The “We do it in evenings and seethe family resemblance." ~ a» t ‘ ., ’ a ,
Skeletal remains of a man found last weekends and odd hours here and Wolf said he had built the chm in- i N l w 1 .
summer have been identified there," he said, adding “we usually correctly because there was no . . , _ ‘. .’ . '
through a unique rebuilding project average about a full week (per jawbone available for guidance. and .5 \ I ,z "
performed by a University forensic easel." the face should have been slightly at ;‘- , " 4;
anthropological team. However, he said the Robbins case fuller and more wrinkled. But he was r ’ - A.» ~ I ,
At a news conference “15‘1“ in t°°k more time because only two years off on the age, and us ...~ W _ / ’ - '
Carroll County, where part Of the reconstructing facial features takes was right on the rest of his descrip- .. W“ "' 7—— '
. skeleton was found, it was announced longer than the methods used in other tion. Q - : "‘——' ’ I ‘ _ ,
ﬂight: at}??? 33;: those (jug:- 035°5- Accurate reproductions of facial 1 2'" , . ..—-———— 7. .' .7
l r ms, 3 , . ~ -- .
1980 escapee from the Gallatin Coun- From just the skeletal evidence ﬁxﬁt argfﬁibfﬁjfﬁgééze .m: ' __ . .
ty Jail. Wolf determmed that the two halves Wolf saidy ' ' it I I - E ‘ ‘ ‘————- I

The body was identified largely were part of the same skeleton, and “The bone itself is not going to ~g-w- k‘w ‘ h .1 ,I . . .-
through the efforts of Dr. David Wolf, later told police that the man was change much after death“ he said . W . 5. . _
one of about 40 forensic an- about 50 had light brown hair, was 5 “With the underlying bone structure . ‘ ' "“.. -‘ we...“ . , . .- -.
thropologists in the COUhh'Y- WOW feet, 8 inches tall, hard 0f hearing, you can reproduce the soft tissue con- M ‘ ,. ~ ‘ . '
aided by graduate student Virginia right-handed, wore a partial plate, struction n " " ’ “ ' é ‘ 5 '
Smith, was able to perform a “soft- and had a-drlnking problem. wolf said that while “basic . “ﬂit-n“ m; l 5: -
tissue reconstruction" Of the skull by Wolf said he Was able to determine features will be there" the more sub- .. V w i t l ' -. ’
pasting balsa wow and clay over the Robbins’ drinking problem because tle facial features such as the shape '4‘: > .. .1
skull to produce facial features he alcohol has an effect 0" the hOdY'S of the nose or the structure of the ear 4 g :i “g ' '
thought the man might have had. bone structure ._ “people who use lobe “may notbereconstructable." 1‘ ' 2 "

“This is the kind of stuff people see ,drugs, including alcohol, will The Robbins case was Wolf's 42nd .~ ‘I . . »_ f _
on television, but they don’t realize it undergo skeletal changes.” The ef- or 43rd of the year. he said. “What 1 . ,. ,. aw ' ' ‘ «.3» . .. _ ‘ '
happens in real life," said Carroll fects can only be observed “min a get are very badly decomposed , . . I . ‘ k
County Coroner Jim Dunn. Six month period after death, he add- skeletal or very badly burned or \ - '. .

The skeleton was found l“ two ed. mutilated individuals that cannot be 3:: l 5 w
parts, one last September in Dunn searched through missing readily identified." I » - at '
Switzerland County, Ind, and the person reports and found that Rob— wolf said he tries to determine - W ' , ' It
other last November across the Ohio bins matched the description sup three things when he receives such a -* ‘
River in Carroll County. Wolf was plied by Wolf. He checked hairs from case; the individual‘s identity, the , U ' . . “
asked to help with the case on acap Willard had allegedly left along cause of death and the manner of ...; * - - . j '
November 11 and went to the scene to with his wallet at the site of a death. - "
help local officials gather evidence. burglary — he had been in jail He said he has been able to obtain - . , . - 1 .'

After collecting evidence Wolf said awaiting trial on that charge -— and an identification in over half of the ’ . ' IVs-1' ‘
he and Smith “waited until shortly the hairs matched the color wolf had caseshehas received. - , . t
after Christmas to see if they could surmised. “The success rate is pretty g ood, . . . .'
provide us with a name. Some time in Dunn obtained photographs of Rob- maybe in the 60-70 percent bracket. n ' -‘ . ,;_ - 4 . _
January we started the bins, butWolfdidnotlookatthemun- wolf said Robbins died from a » ‘ . 2
reconstruction. We finished it a cou— til he and Smith completed the sharp blow to the back of the head . 1 . j , ~
Ple 0’ three weeks ago.“ reconstruction. from a blunt instrument. Dunn "‘ ‘ t 3 ‘

Wolf said his work on cases such as The likeness they created was so speculated that Robbins might have . t ' ~ .. 7
the Robbins identification is outside accurate it was immediately been killed, then thrown into the Ohio . . g ‘ . . , , 1.!
consultation and not part of his work recognized by Robbins' nephew, who River, adding that the body might _ . .
for the University as co-director of a was called in to identify the have been severed going over a dam . , ' .
research project for the national in— reconstructed skull. or through locks on the river, or may \ . ”it _ ' I i ‘
stitution for aging. “The nephew walked in and said,“ have been cut in two by a tug. v" , - ' . 't‘ .L' f .

o o o _. . . ,. . . . 4‘ . , .
Must lift weights, keep trim ,- ~ I . :. ,_~ - _ ,_ .1,
’8] WM h l d l t d ‘ "
1 cat 0 eer ea ers se 66 e
Th th' k "
By NELLFIELDS The men, chosen from 12 con- did a variety of cheers, dance 9 1“ er .
Staff Writer testants, were the following: ar- routines, jumps, ﬂips, handsprings , . I , . _ . -. . . , , . . h. _n l_ t t t. _l 7
chitecture senior LeeAckiss; recrea- and cartwheels. Late Monday night Studying for an accounting test. (hris Aaron makes administration I‘ll‘l‘)r.gd-\t~ :"N l) ”t .‘lté 'llut. o g .
After two nights of intensely nerve- tion managment sophomore Steve the field of women contestants was himself comfortable in Memorial Hall. The busmess prepare foi themam. arrningtwohours lll a \aiiu. :‘ I",

melting and competitive tFYOUtSv 8 Gibson; business s0phomore Jeff narrowed to 11. Tuesday, after inter- .- ,- :1»-

panel of seven judges Tuesday even- Gothard; advertising senior Tim views with the judges, the women ': . ."

ing selected the 1931 Wildcat female Hudson; biology junior Donald Ware finalists and the 12 men competed . f '

and male cheerleaders. and engineering junior Mark again. aw O S a [In an says ean .v ‘_ IL ,

Chosen from an initial field of 22 Wingate. Over 400 friends, family members ’ . «j ,

women were the following: arts and Before announcing the winners, and UK students watched the com- “3. 'n

science freshman Julie Billington: cheerleading sponsor T- Lynn petition intently. When the winners ByCllRlSASll the school placement and exploring The associate dean said more 1.\ a . :_ 9

English sophomore Tomi Anne Williamson said, “the talent ex- were announced, the crowd quieted Associate EditOl‘ their employment prospects. Stevens trend of more students working for i . '

Blevins; biology freshman Kim hibited tonight was overwhelming. down then cheered f0r each number said many of these students have corporations. "It was onu- coil 3'?“

Calvert; telecommunications junior hht as you khovahly Six men and Six Choseh- Students graduating from law been “making careless decisions sidcrcd being the backwater of thc '.’ " '.

[mlie DaVlS; education freshmen girls can make it.” AS each number was called, the school in [he next two years will have based on incorrect information." legal profession It) be employed h)- rl '- f 5

Lisa Perkins and physical education And the talent was overwhelming. winners'ran down to the floor, hugg- better job opportunities than they ex_ “They will have relied on that for corporation.” - i 5. .

senior Mona Wilson. For two nights the women and men ed the others, cried. laughed and let pect. according to Carroll Stevens. two or three years and put This change resulted in pnii 1mm 4, .

80 Cheers The Winners Wth tell aSSOCiate dean of the law school. themselves in jeopardy" of not being the Legal Schiccs ('ortxn‘ution .- .
. anybody two things — it was written "It is true there is a maldistribu- able to finda job to suit them Created by the Office of Economic 5 t ‘
on their faces Tuesday night ‘ they tion of lawyers — diminished oppor- Stevens cited a National Associa- Development in the early '70s \mt. ] ' It:
' love the Wildcats and they love to tunities in certain geographical tion of Law Placement survey of 1979 Stevens said. the tun largest l' 5 law 'lI' ‘ts‘.
cheer. regions," Stevens said, hUt OPPOI“ graduates as evidence that the job firms are the legal skills of .“.' If
“It’s been a dream for me ever tunities “continue tobecxcellent for crunch is not as severe as many American Tclcphonc and Telegraph ’5
'~ since I was a little girl to be a UK law-trained people.“ think. According to the study, 97 per- (70 and Exxon 3‘7 .
' . cheerleader," said Wilson, who was a Stevens, head 0f the SChOOI'S place- cent of those who graduated from law Another increase iii ions resulted , i .
varsity Cheerleader last year. “I just ment service for graduates, to“ an schools accredited by the American when the federal government set up n ' .
. love cheeringllove the crowd.Ilove audience 0t 50. mostly ht‘St' and Bar Association and then passed bar network in the lillt‘ limos to pl‘thltlt‘ - 7' '
' theWildcats.” second-year students. that they can examinations found employment by legal St‘l‘Vlt‘t‘ tor 11m lllt'tlnlt‘ people rt;
' . “ There ‘5 315° 3 ‘0‘ 0‘ camaraderie be successful in finding appmpriate March 1, 1980 Stephens cs1imaiictl the schicc. _' _ '
I ' / ' ‘ withinthecheerleading squad. thS it they $99k correct 10h informa- “The situation of graduates from known in Kentucky as the Public ' 1 ~
'* “It’s like a sorority," said Blevins. tion and invest energy into the place- this law school is better than that," Defender sun-m. created sooo m ’ .
. . - Who has been cheerleading since the ment process. Stevens added. He said a check of 8000 jobs. '.
' - touth Erode ”Once “9‘70“ knows He said each year he conducts 1979 17K graduates showed that “Some eh-nn-nis Ill the Reagan Ad ' . '.
\ eaCh other, we‘re out to help the about 15 “exit interviews" 7— contaC- everyone who passed the bar and ministration want to do away with it 1.5
,, . .w 4. otherout.“ Confined on pages ting students who have never used sought employment landed .thS- t'ontinucd on pagex r,‘ fol",
S t d t k Id 17“ °
. to .~ t y y .
' . ﬂ” above 67 rcent and no one got more demonstrates “a nearly catastrophic toms tunductcd by the ETS are not ,_ '
’ ‘x A i- i From APand Staff Dispatches than 84 oiwthe 101 questions right on ignorance on the part of the reliable - . ‘
J 3, the complex multiple—choice test American people." “i would not be lllCllllt‘tl to take for .‘ I .
,2 "*5! WASHINGTON _. Most college prepared by the Educational Testing Karo n Min gst, a UK political rhhlit‘siri‘ously i test conducted by .
it ‘ StUdehtS know little about foreign af— SerVice. i . science professor. said that although t t ‘T‘ ‘ Dye sald‘ but added that ‘ ‘
fairs and a sizeable minority seems ETS and the (‘ounCil on Learning. a she had not seen the study, she she could not judge the validity of the . I
[I " tocareless, a governmentsponsored non-profit research group, Sponsored believed the results were “no dif- “‘3‘“ “WW-‘9 She has "0t 599" 4' copy ‘
survey indicates. the project. It was paid for by Stan's ferent than what you would probably 0' It . .
~ Thesurvey of 3,000 students on 185 totaling $500111) from the National find in the general public." .. However, she said the findings . ,
campuses found 65 percent of the Endowment for the Humanities and . . (‘0u‘d he fairly accurate because - _
seniors were stumped when asked the Department of Education and UK history professor Nancy Dye. there seems tobeaw’ideespread lack . . .
\. what nations belong totheOrganiza- $130,000 from the Exxon Education however, said she has found that of interest inforeign affairs, .
ﬂ" tion of Petroleum Exporting Coun- Foundation. _____,_ . .
\\ I‘ﬁ ., tries. Less than 30 percent realized The results were released today at Q ”slag Insng _
‘ ~ r OPEC has members outside the Mid- Georgetown UniverSity s School of .
" die East. Foreign Service, where educators Spring daze. increasing cloudiness mien the spring meet began at
:r Overall, seniors answered only 50 and experts on foreign affairs ex- today with the high in the low 70s Keeneland. Kernel turf writer Marty . - .
* percent of the foreign affairs ques- pressed alarm and'called upon col- There is a 40 percent chance of McGee had 3500 of the paper‘s money
By nun LAW/Kernel son tion: correctly. freshmen 41 percent leges to upgrade their teaching. showers tonight, with a low of 50. The to invest in a profitsharing plan. Un- _
' and two-year college students 40 per Steven Muller, prestdent of The weekend may get off to a wet start. fortunately. the track. not the
Acrobatics were the order of the evening at May's tryouts. cent. Johns Hopkins UniverSIty In Tomorrow's high will again be m the Kernel. profited from McGee‘s luck.
bees than one senior in 10 scored Baltimore, said the study low 7m.but showers are likely. The details are on page 6,
't \ ﬂ -.-" '- - "O A ‘ V ' ~ W ' V J, h l - h A -A——-. ﬁ" t ' l

 ________*__W_,._. .. 1 ._*________._—
I I
I are u re. Met-
2 d It orl a I s & tsgxrayw mm: Editor 3% :;?;:M' garment Editor Picture Editor
. mun-mi “we.”
i comments "“ m.... “W“
vuu Poole
I I . Jun M Auiuont Day Editor mat-I‘d 9"" “r: u" “a“. . m
I Buy Editor M ll“! Auietont Sports Editor Autetant Entertainment Editor MAM
. I mlmlu‘h Kernel Intro-m ellkitm and opium-i. [titan no opinion Meet typed. triple Dulce.“
~ roared Md tidied: lane. nude-er and proper identification including 1 I ll) for eluded!» and l I Celchllul
I employees. It“!!! about“ be limited to zoo input and opinion and comments to ”0 north. Seniorerlun
L...-.. .___ ._ n____-..._a_, _ .__ ._._._ __ -._...- _._.___———————————-——-——""-—_——_————-
Proposed solutions to handgun controversy do not attack the problem
/ / I s I
. ' I Emily time that someone takes a » ﬁ") 65%,, , (allegedly) shot the President (and murders which gun controls would
. - shot at a public person, the debate " Eﬂ~ ~ . —l , produced an alleged wound) was do the most to prevent. we ignore;
_ , over gun control surfaces in the j, .1 ' Wm / aging , / ' determined enoughtohave produc- we are outraged only by the
, . . news and the minds of the public. ' r, “1 I I e- I. / eda handgun over almost any legal shootings which we have the least
3 ‘ Every time that someone attmepts d u 'I l T ‘QX a D obstacles. Mark David Champman power to prevent. Americans buy
‘ an assassimtion, pressure is put on and ' -"‘ " ‘ (who is alleged to have shot John handguns attheratIeofone every 13
. .- . the Congress to pass some kind of lCO . All ;. ‘— " . l "'- Lennon) was not stopped from ob- seconds, a rate which does not con-
gun control legislation. Every time p . Ii! “ " ) ' .._.—- ,6: j l I II ta'ining a gun, nor was Arthur vinceonethat we wantguncontrol.
. 4 that the Congress takes up a serious I ~13 . , | [l Bremer, who shot George Wallace. Our primaryI forms of entertain
, » bun contml debate- the National Ri- 3-1.; )3 I .Ij.' However, gun control would ment (televtsnon, mowes and
’ -_ ‘ . fle Association cranks up its lobby- 9'; I ‘3 \g " 1- I 1' E‘ ‘ reduce some murders. If the books) are mild stories of people
‘ ' ing orgaxzation and such legisla- '~ ' (.4. ‘3; |\ l I government could successfully who solve then problems With 3
- , ' tion is de ated. form which would reduce the I i'.‘ 7.- ‘ ._ reduce the number of handguns in gun- “I18 soc1alize 0“? Chlldl‘eh ““0
-. " ‘ The NRA positionis that gun con- number of guns in the possession of I ' A .J / r— 31, "3%; American homes, the number of believing that weaP°h§ can be a
. trol Wlll not stop violent crime, that mans. There are over 50 million . —-r by. " ‘9 ﬂ 0,- o// the most frequent type of homicide posnwe force for socnal change;
" ' _ only stiff sentences and strict dguns alone inprivate hands in I it . [I A? D would decrease. Four hundred after all, it wasgunsthat helpedus
~ . , judges will reduce crime, The NRA the U ed States, or one handgun _. IEIIII. m Americans die every week from gain our independence, free the
. j .- position can be summed up with for evgpyfour ofus. How could they l, d- {g i, D homicide, and in most cases the slaves and expand across the contl- .
. I two bumper sticker blurbs: “When he confiscated? From whom would . . 'Jﬂw victim knew the killer. Wives are nent. .
- guns are outlawed, only outlaws they be confiscated? If the con- I II *3 5’ - 1 murdering their husbands (and The problem isn’t reallyallofthe
' - ' ’ will have guns" and “They'll take iiscatory system were to be essen- “’0‘ W '. vice versa), and friends are killing guns out there. The number of
', my gun when they pry it from my tially voluntary, it is not reasonable - - .- each other at a frightening rate weapons in our country is a symp-
' - I cold. dead fingers." to expect people who intend to com- W over trivial reasons; two people tom rather than a disease in itself.
. , I But what will gun control really mit crimes to turn in their guns. If ” W Mb MP? PM.” have an argument over what was or However, it is far from being as
' do" If the only form of gun control the system is ‘to provide for com- police force to enter our homes to willing to break the law to get it, not was not done by whom, they get simple as the “IGUDS don’tIklll peo-
. .' imposed is some sort of national pensation for the confiscated pro- look for items purchased legally alcohol, not marijuana, not pro- loud and angry, and onepullsagun ple, people lullI people people
- ‘ ’- registration it will not reduce the perty (as would be required by cer- and never used illegally? Can the stitution, not gambling. What the from the coffee table and ends the would haveusbeheve. The problem
. . n r 0t guns in the hands 0t lain interpretations of the Con- government, in the absense of a gonverment did do is createa pro- argument. If the gun had not been IS that we are DOt yet ClVlllT-ed
. Americans, and it will not stop that stitution) the system itself would constitutional amendment, con- sperous criminal element to pro- there, the homicide would not have enough to be embarrassed when
. . number fromlincreasing. The only provide the incentive for more fiscate guns purchased when such vide the illegal commodity. occurred. other nations see “5 trying to kill
' tle'ng that such registration can do cri e; people might well resort to pprchase was legal; would that not It was the attempt on the like of But do we really want gun con- our prﬁldﬂlt- To paraphrase from
" is to allow the police to more easily thend'ieft of guns to sell them to the be a form of ex post facto law? President Reagan which brought trol? A recent Gallop Poll found the mov1e Patton,Iwe love it. God
, identify the owner of a weapon used confiscation authorities. In either case, a system designed this debate to the forefront. But that 62 percent of Americans want help us, we doloveit $0~
' , _ on a q'ime if the weapon is found. If the system were to be an in- to confiscate handguns would cer- would gun control have prevented stricter laws governing the sale of
That will not prevent the crime voluntary confiscation. how could it tainly create one thing —-a thriving this or any other premeditated handguns. But with 400 of our
. - , from occurring. be handled? Would the FBI have to black market for guns. Not one crime? The suspect allegedly stalk- neighbors dying every week, we on- Dane Plco is a staff columnist.
. ' lf gun control is to be effective "1 search every home to locate guns? thing has the government suc- ed not only Mr. Reagan but Presi- 1y get upset when a crackpot takes His column appears every other
- . reducing crime. thN.‘ it must beofa DO we WlSh to create a national cessfully kept from people who are dent Carter last year. The man who a shot at a public figure. The Thursday.
. . - , .7 . > .
_ . , Who gets the coverage? T me and effort don I seem to make the front page
' ' You see the complaints in the Let- ﬂ and the following case illustrates this basketball players. Debate Tournament in Pomona, meet Gil Skillman. a UK graduate
' . ters to the Editor every week: “How I well. Surely, the victorious debaters California on Monday, they slinked and the nation’s top debater his
. . ” could the newspaper have missed the On Monday, the University of Ken- merit some media attention. The 0“ to their hotel room without the senior year. Gil would surely help
> , , event we sponsored last week? I tucky‘s debate team advanced tothe selection of UK cheerleaders was burden of inquiring reporters or the smooth the way for a former Ken-
‘ Thousands of people showed up, we I semi-final round of competition at covered by CBS in depth, and the glare of television mini-cam tuckian, and the cumulative effect of
. raised thousands of dollars for chari- James a. I the National Debate Tournament. endless post-season basketball play spotlights. Maybe Wednesday, when many alumni helping UK students is.
‘ - ty and broke three records in the "is? was more, Jeff Jones, one of the continues to receive ample they returned home, someone would what helps universities advance.
'. Guiness Book." grifﬁn I £97, I L debaters, was voted the tour- newsprint. call the media or UK’s information Debate alumni also contribute to
. - j Or this one: “Our chess team won I / I naments's top speaker, the best Should a UK athlete travel to service, but by then the story would the university's coffers and are con-
' » _’ the sub-Midwest regional paired l , debater in the country. California for the national tourna- beworthaninch, orafew seconds, or sistently among the most interested
' .‘ competition for staggered entries on I ‘f’ ‘I If Steve Mancuso or Jeff Jones ment, the media will follow along, two, at most. leaders seeking ways to assist the
. a seven-man field, and we didn‘t see L he a were basketball players, as the sending back reports by telephone It is hard to draw comparisons university and direct its future.
' " » anything about it in the paper." ”ﬂ ' classic argument goes, their names and generally, beating the story to between different activities, even dif- Who is to blame for the neglect of
' .' Some of the letters make a good allocated toadaﬂy newspaper. would be household words death. Not only would the debaters ferent athletic endeavors. But activities like debate?
. point: The newspaper should have What pleases the tastes of the most throughout the Bluegrass. Alas, not have to worry about phoning in debaters put in at least the same Before indicting the media, con-
« ~ ‘ known about the event and sent a readers is often the best that can be those chose to debate and, as a result, the results of the tournament on their amount of preparation for just as ex- sider the circumstances they face ——
-. , » - reporter or photographer. Others, hoped for, and the special interests of the spotlight will never shine their own, they would now have to confront tended a time period. low reader interest, lack of space and
‘ - I though, fail to grasp the realities im- the minority must be satiated by way, their fame restricted to those the gazing eyes of more attention They research several hoursaday, competing demands on their atten-
. . I - ' posed on those who print words for small. specialized magazines and who know them welllor watch them than most people can handle. on the average, year round, with full tion. If the media are to help build in-
. . _ - money. There is limited space. and trade papers. perform. They will not survive on When Mancuso and Jones lost in practice sessions (more than five terest in debate, they will need the
. .; . . ~ even less time and resources, The answer is not always simple, their notoriety, as have many ex-UK the sIemi.ﬁnal round of the National hours a day) throughout the regular cooperation, indeed, the urging, of
". season, which runs from October the university to keep them aware of
‘ ‘» ‘ . All contributions should he delivered to IN Jour- through April the results OBI a more timely b85lS.
.. - l tt rs to t he I tor nallsm Building. University of Kentucky, Lexington. When the debaters attend 8 m‘ That m only fa“.-
. .‘ KY., 40506. The Kernel reserves the right to edit for ment, they debate more than elght It is ironic, though, that a paper
.- ‘. margalraII-dnfmpzmmifu :2,.:l‘:“..§.“.:.';ulf;’.'°“‘ times it weekend, sometimes a dozen with an editorial page crying out for
, ._ : ' ‘ rounds an hour and a'half in duration. responsible public expression would
, r, . ' I . , . . . , . . They might attend a dozen tour- fail to seek out examples of success
~ ‘ years may pass With no changes in the gene s structure (in the form of its . . .
i .' , creation vs“ EVOlutlon successors). However, when changes do occur in the gene (mutation), the net naments da year, thtravedhvng :0 both that bloom mthe shadow 0f "5 plant.
" :_' ' The teaching of the theory of evolution is one of the cruelest hoaxes ever effect is harmful and many times lethal. carats anI across “perfumes ha f . dBe fore bIamlng the debaters, con-
j , . _ fmsted upon the minds of men and women. In spite of this, evolutionists claim that a small fraction (say one in 10,000) I ey "Birgit: n 1r 5 tedre: :lxlf; the cu'cmurgstances they face _
' _ ‘ The General Theory of Evolution, the theory that all living things have of these mutations net a beneficial result. According to Dr. Duane Gish, who c ”56' a la. 11 yscciyoml W]. g "590“ da hours 0‘ travel
' "I , arisen by naturalistic, mechanistic processes from a single primeval cell, has spent 18 years in biomedical and biochemical research at Cornell Univer- "lees” partla dps an (sometimes .yS) after the event,
,' - ’ which in turn had arisen by similar processes from a dead, inanimate world, sity Medical College, these claims are made not because of empirical time-consuming work-stu y pro- ml?“ umvel'sltyIassmtanceandIthe
-‘. .' has been dogmatically taught in the classroom for decades as undisputed fact. evidence, but because evolutionists know that unless favorable mutations do grams. Solt UK’ . tant h desire . to avond looking “he
, . I ‘. ‘ . July 21. 1925 at Dayton. Tennessee, the setting for the now-infamous Scopes occur, evolution is impossible. The significance of this statement is realized as 1' Roger ha, Swiss: d waged ﬁcmanluiiesorbraggarts. Wm
. . . Monkey Trial. was the day that evolutionary theory “came of age" in spite of one considers the fact that in the end, all evolution is attributedtomutation. ”a on w t can y Iescrl pub c has no mmt’ so they
, .' ‘ g 1. a substantial lack of weighty scientific evidence. As D.M.S. Watson, himself a In reality, mutations offer a perfect illustration of the second law of ther— as a poverty-level wage, “Eh com- neglect to, put the information before
. . , committed evolutionist, put it, "The theory of evolution itself is a theory modynamics, which says in essence that the natural tendency of all change is ”amigos; part-tun: has“ for a mﬂﬁga' d
' universally accepted not because it can be proven by logically coherent to createa greater degree of disorder and randomness. This would mean that 3:! :3] t requen yrunsmore in] man' 811mm“
. ewdence to be true but because the only alternative, Special Creation, is the overall direction of change of a biological “kind" wouldbedeteriorative D: J W 'P tt UK’ b d of lobby assume to “MI l 3,
., I’ clearly incredible." rather than developmental. This is evident not only in the case of present ch h. ‘ b: mt. F tea Scholasm on lha ml r '
T -' ,i Further indication that the theory of evolution is on shaky ground was ap- genetic changes, but also in those evidences nthat have been cited in favor of C(fm data? a dge {Is in”??? f “it? sports and‘dzba l 1M“
, ‘ * parent at the recent meeting in Chicago‘s Field Museum of Natural History. past evolutionary changes. For example, the evidence of vestigial organs is (Se w al 1: “3:358” dsor f e tsn frllm map-at?» te
. There. 160 of the world‘s top paleontologists, population geneticists. em~ often cited as an argument for evolution. But it is immediately evident that debzlte off‘ilges thezearis 3%?“ :f oInowthe {123m . how 't'
-, ‘, 1. Ii " bryologists. molecular biologists. and geologists gathered to discuss a possi< the loss of organs through disuse is an illustration of deterioration. Wildcat Blue vans for the exclusive w rth uesti . 5:15;,“ evil-tails
II . ' ' ,-‘ ble alternative to past evolutionary models. They admitted severe problems Today, literally hundreds of men who hold advanced degrees and PhDs in fth thl ti am et Pat— 0 q oning . tel-“:52 .m a
f , with the current evolutionary interpretation of the fossil record and with the such areas of science as biology, chemistry, geology, physics, and zoology :eo . efarceed 3pm? ,y t coveragezrortfliging u; m any
l - . supposed mechanism for evolution itself. These are the exact points the crea- would claim that the theory of special creation fits best with what science has b.2021 15. ° ren vans a exor- actmtyih e peep e we 1:? to .
.' '- 3, ‘ ' tionisl scientists have been making for the past 10 years. I See SCIENCE, taughtusin recent years. The fundamental philosophical consideration for all ' if prices. , attract esame peopewhow) dbe
' , ' ' VOlume 210. P8805 883-387- 1980 and Newsweek. p886 95—96. November 3. of us then, becomes in the words of the late Jean Paul Sartre, the fact that Naturally, the debaters ”[23:81 attracted by media coverage. There
'- 7 ; 1980‘ ’ “something is there rather than that nothing is there." We have two choices: value system must accopid .11: ls S‘anle beauty m competing and
' 'I a The time has come for thinking men and women to investigate the evidence One is the evolution model, which basically says that man is a random hap- sacrifices for Ilong-tetzmbréwa ' playing the game for the sake 0‘ the
. ' ._’ ‘ ', ' for themselves and to weigh and evaluateit pening, a product of chance, with the earth's history dominated by unifor- debate team ‘8 not e tli route to enjoyment derived, “nth no egos or
‘ . f , ,‘r Due to time and space limitations, I would like to focus my attention on only mitarianism, The other is the creation model, which postulates that man was popularity m school, wt. 1 e way to pubhc t? stand m the “’9’-
E I_. ; i . one of the many problems with the evolution model. Key to the evolutionist‘s created supernaturally, the earth's history being dominated by catastophism. attract the best-looking 3" s m . What 5 worse, the bigger any ac-
.“ ' ‘; , -- ; theory is the concept that long series of micromutations have resulted in the I would challenge you to be intellectually honest in considering both. The Debate has no well-known la twity becomes, the more 't “0st
f - ' development of new species That this is only theory and not established fact moral and philosophical implications of each are far-reaching. smm‘ and more often than Mt the out "‘5 amateurs. As recent events
1: ' ‘ was admitted by professor Goldschmidt of the University of California 5‘8” 0‘ “We ”Pena?“ °“ 3 havel’mveni‘heyﬁfemval‘19b'9w
:- ‘I ' «another ardent evolutionist) when he stated, “Nobody has produced even a Doug Miller resume classifies the applllItéant as a lose </pre>