xt7pg44hqs49 https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7pg44hqs49/data/mets.xml University of Kentucky. University Senate University of Kentucky. Faculty Senate Kentucky University of Kentucky. University Senate University of Kentucky. Faculty Senate 1971-12-13 minutes 2004ua061 English Property rights reside with the University of Kentucky. The University of Kentucky holds the copyright for materials created in the course of business by University of Kentucky employees. Copyright for all other materials has not been assigned to the University of Kentucky. For information about permission to reproduce or publish, please contact the Special Collections Research Center. University of Kentucky. University Senate (Faculty Senate) records Minutes (Records) Universities and colleges -- Faculty University of Kentucky University Senate (Faculty Senate) meeting minutes, December 13, 1971 text University of Kentucky University Senate (Faculty Senate) meeting minutes, December 13, 1971 1971 1971-12-13 2020 true xt7pg44hqs49 section xt7pg44hqs49

3270 Minutes of the University Senate, November 29, 1971 — cont

at the last meeting of the Senate in connection with consideration by the
Senate of the Code of Faculty Responsibilities.) He also reported that
copies of the Regulations are also available in Deans' offices, in
educational units, and the offices of department chairmen.

The Senate adjourned at 4:00 p.m.

Kathryne W. Shelburne
Recording Secretary

MINUTES OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE, DECEMBER 13, 1971

The University Senate met in regular session at 3:00 p.m., Monday, December

13, 1971 in Room 106 of the Classroom Building. Chairman Rovin presided.
Members absent#: Lawrence A. Allen*, Kurt Anschel*, Charles L. Atcher,
Ronald Atwood*, James R. Barclay*, Charles E. Barnhart, Harmon C. Bickley*,
Robert H. Biggerstaff, Harry M. Bohannan, P. P. Bosomworth*, Eugene B.
Bradley*, Ralph S. Carpenter*, S. K. Chan*, Richard A. Chapman*, David B.
Clark*, Glenwood L. Creech, Tihamer Z. Csaky*, George W. Denemark*,

Loretta Denman*, Juanita Fleming%, James E. Funk*, George H. Gadbois*,
Eugene B. Gallagher*, Joseph Hamburg, Alfred S. L. Hu*, Raymon D. Johnson,
William F. Kenkel*, Robert W. Kiser*, Stuart M. Klein*, James A. Knoblett*,
Bruce E. Langlois, Robert G. Lawson, Donald C. Leigh*, Paul Mandelstam*,
Leslie L. Martin*, James T. Moore*, James R. Ogletree*, Curtis Phipps*,
Nicholas J. Pisacano, Virginia Rogers*, Gerald I. Roth*, Donald S. Shannon*,
D. Milton Shuffett*, Eldon D. Smith*, Leonard P. Stoltz*, Robert H. Stroup*,
Thomas B. Stroup, Charles G. Talbert*, Roy E. Swift*, Betty A. Taylor*,
Timothy H. Taylor, H. Mac Vandiviere*, M. Stanley Wall, William S. Ward,
David R. Wekstein*, Harry E. Wheeler*, William R. Willard, Constance P. Wilson,
Miroslava B. Winer*, Ernest Witte*.

The minutes of the special meeting of November 29, 1971 were approved
as circulated.

Dr. Carl Cone presented a memorial resolution on the death of Dr.
A. D. Kirwan with the request that it be incorporated in the minutes
of this meeting and that copies be sent to Mrs. Kirwan and to their sons,
A. D. Kirwan, Jr., and William E. Kirwan, II. Following the reading of
the resolution the Senators and visitors stood for a moment of silence in
memory and respect for Dr. Kirwan and in acceptance of the resolution.

Albert Dennis Kirwan

Albert Dennis Kirwan, Professor of History, spent his distinguished
career in furthering education in Kentucky where he lived all of his
life. He was born in Louisville on December 22, 1904. He attended
the Louisville schools and the University of Kentucky where he re-
ceived his bachelor's degree in 1926. For the next decade he taught

*Absence explained
#One of the attendance sheets could not be accounted for at the close of the

meeting; therefore, if we have marked a Senator absent who was, in fact, present,

please call Mrs. Shelburne and she will correct the roll.

maﬁa”,

«v

!
my
‘4 W )V \ >1!“

. 54
""1. "

(

;
E3? .
» w w

Minutes of the University Senate, December 13, 1971 — cent

and coached football in Louisville Manual and Male high schools. During
that time he earned the bachelor of law degree in the Jefferson School
of Law. He returned in 1938 to the University of Kentucky where for

six years he was head football coach. With a master's degree in history
from the University of Louisville, he entered the Graduate School of
Duke University which in 1947 conferred upon him the doctor of philosophy 1‘
degree. Dr. Kirwan returned again to the University of Kentucky as "
Associate Professor of History and Dean of Men. In 1955 he resigned

as Dean of Students to teach full time in history. By 1960 when the

University called him again to serve in an administrative position,

three books and several articles had established him as a leading

authority in the history of the South and the American Middle period.

Dr. Kirwan served as Dean of the Graduate School between 1960—1966,

a time of spectacular growth whether measured by enrollment, financial

support, or numbers and improved quality of graduate programs. Yet his

own scholarly research continued. His biography of John J. Crittenden

won the Hallam Prize, the Sydnor prize of the Southern Historical _
Association, and recognition from the Civil War Book Club and the ‘ .1
History Book Club. When he returned full time to the History Depart— 1
ment in 1966 he looked forward eagerly to teaching and writing. But
the University would need him once more. During 1968—1969 he served
in the difficult role of acting president at a time when aCademic
life generally was filled with uncertainties, was confronted with
demands for change, and when the University of Kentucky in particular
had to defend itself (successfully) in the notorious Main Chance
case. The importance to the University of the steadying presence of
Ab Kirwan and his wonderful wife Betty at Maxwell Place during that
year cannot be overvalued. The Board of Trustees, with the undoubted
approval of the University community and the peOple of Kentucky, re—
cognized that service by conferring full presidential status upon him
as the seventh president of the University.

When he resumed his professorship of History in 1969 Dr. Kirwan
expected to enjoy six uninterrupted years of teaching and scholarship
before retirement. He specifically requested the opportunity to
teach freshmen. He resumed work on a biography of Henry Clay. The
semester's leave of absence to which he was entitled as Distinguished
Professor of the College of Arts and Sciences, 1967—68, was still owing
to him, and he planned to take it during the spring semester, 1972,
to work on the Clay biography.

He was thus looking ahead to new achievements when he died
suddenly on November 30, 1971. If he had not paused to look back—
wards over his illustrious career, we may mention some of the honors
accorded to him during the career just sketched. He was an outstanding
athlete in football and track. Best known in the 1930's as a
successful high school football coach in Louisville, he valued just as
highly his work as a teacher of history. His football teams at the
University of Kentucky compiled a very creditable record, especially
considering the level of support given football at that time. As a
scholar he was author of two well—received books, joint author of
another, editor of three books, and a contributor to two others. Among
many academic assignments he was chairman of the University of
Kentucky Press Committee, chairman for six years of the Rules In—
fractions Committee of the National Collegiate Athletic Association,

Minutes of the University Senate, December 13, 1971 — cont

and in several ways was involved in the supervision and study of

graduate education in the United States. He was a member of

Phi Beta Kappa, Omicron Delta Kappa, and three historical associations.
He was a Guggenheim Fellow and a Fulbright Lecturer at the University

of Vienna. Within the University, he won an Alumni Research Award

and an Alumni Teaching award. He was Hallam Professor of History,
1967—1969, and Distinguished Professor of Arts and Sciences, 1967—68.

His name is listed in the Hall of Distinguished Alumni of the University
of Kentucky.

These are matters of written record. In the record of our
memories he was a strong, gentle, tolerant man. Love for people
was the theme of his life. As a football coach, a classroom teacher,
Dean of Students, Dean of the Graduate School, and President of the
University, he enjoyed a unique variety of relationships with students;
he knew students well, and he loved them. Each time he returned to
full time teaching it was with the expectation of being free to give
himself fully to students.

Though he did not seek out the administrative positions which
took him away from the classroom, in each of these positions he
saw opportunities of serving the University and the students. That
was why he enjoyed every responsibility the University placed upon
him. His love for people was limitless; it was this great love that
made his life so useful and so happy and enriched the lives of all
of us.

Mr. Scott Wendelsdorf presented the following motion to amend the

University Senate Rules, page 41, Section III: 2. Requirements for
Graduation ——

”To be eligible for any degree, a student must have completed
the requirements as approved by the University Senate, except
that curriculum substitutions may be made by the college
affected if not inconsistent with these Rules. Curriculum
requirements must include, in addition to specified credits,

a specified grade point average which shall in no case be less
than 2.0. . . .

"The General Studies Component in every baccalaureate degree
program shall consist of not more than five (5) areas of study
chosen by the student from the following eight (8) areas:

(1) Mathematics—Philosophy

(2) Physical Sciences

(3) Biological Sciences

(4) Foreign Languages

(5) Humanities: Literature, Art and Music
(6) History

(7) Social Sciences

(8) Behavioral Sciences"

Dr. Stanford Smith seconded the motion.

Following an explanation of the reasons for the proposed amendment, Mr.
Wendelsdorf yielded the floor to Dr. Staley Adams, Secretary of the

J a
(>

wa:

Inﬂuu‘prWVthy 42$ ..,-.., -..-- .VH ,., . ”.,_... ,...,,.,..., ~... ,,. ., _.,_. _ my“... , , , .1 ._ . ”1,”, .. ‘
. . Wm, .....,.... ...... ,..H

Minutes of the University Senate, December 13, 1971 — cont

Senate Council. On behalf of the Senate Council, Dr. Adams presented the

a following friendly amendment to Mr. Wendelsdorf's proposed amendment. This
€53?“ proposed amendment to the amendment had been handed to the Senators as they
“7: entered the meeting:

”The General Studies Component in every baccalaureate degree

program shall consist of not more than five (5) — (the exact . '
number to be determined by each college) areas of study chosen '
by the student from the following eight (8) areas:

(1) Mathematics — Philosophy

(2) Physical Sciences

(3) Biological Sciences

(4) Foreign Languages

(5) Humanities: Literature, Art and Music
(6) History

(7) Social Sciences

(8) Behavioral Sciences

"The Rules shall be waived only to the extent that they are
inconsistent with certification or accreditation requirements.”

Dr. Adams stated that it should be noted that this proposal from the Senate
Council encompasses both the proposed change by the forwarding group and
adds two important amendments, that of the college determining the exact

[ number to five, and also the waiver, whenever required, for certification

and accreditation requirements; that there are both colleges and de-
partments that have certain requirements which would not fit this rule.

1 The motion was seconded.

Following discussion in which Senators pointed out that there are problems
of required courses for majors, Dr. Stanford Smith requested a division

of the question and that the Senate vote on the amendment in two sections:
., (l) on the question of whether the student has a choice and (2) on the

-A—‘ question of the number of areas. He stated that he had sought the judgment
‘ « of the Parliamentarian who had ruled that this request was not debatable,
not amendable and did not require the prior decision of the Chairman.

This request of Dr. Smith's was seconded.

A Senator raised a point of order that the only thing being discussed was
the amendment to the amendment and not the original amendment. The
Chairman ruled that the original amendment was being discussed since the
initial proposer, Mr. Wendelsdorf, had accepted the amendment as presented
by Dr. Adams; thus, the only amendment then on the floor and under dis—
cussion was Dr. Adam's proposed amendment which Dr. Smith had requested

be divided into two sections to be voted on separately.

Following extensive discussions both for and against the question of
(Egg! student choice, Dr. William Plucknett offered the following substitute
i a motion to the amendment:

that the status guo on General Studies requirements be maintained
1 for the spring semester, 1972; that each undergraduate college
! awarding the baccalaureate degree reevaluate its general studies

meeting.

was that of student choice.
by the Chairman.

of areas of study.

”. areas of study

eight (8) areas:

namely,

H
o

(8) areas: . . .”

The roll call vote follows:

Staley F. Adams
Michael Adelstein
R. L. Anderson
Archdeacon
. Arnold
Bauer
Berry

. Berzins

. . Birge

G. L. Bradford
Mary Brown
William R. Brown
Michael Bruer

C. W. Burnett

zazmpg
L4H m E m S

L. P. Bush

R. E. Cazden
L. W. Cochran
B. G. Collins
Lewis Colten
J. M. Concon

Carl Cone

Minutes of the University Senate, December 13, 1971 — cont

requirements and forward its recommendations to the Senate Council
by February 1, 1972 with copies to the Undergraduate Council, the
Academic Council for the Medical Center, as appropriate, to be
placed on the agenda of the UniverSity Senate for its regular March

The Chairman ruled this motion out of order; that the motion on the floor

The Parliamentarian supported the ruling

chosen by the student from the following
H

Abstain

NI< Z N Z % Z Z Z Z ZI< Z Z % % N Z

Abstain

R. H. Cox

C. J. Cremers
J. E. Criswell
Dan Daffron
Stephen Diachun
R. J. Distler
R. H. Dutt

W. D. Ehmann
Roger Eichhorn
Joel Evans

R. 0. Evans
Paul Ferrell
Garrett Flickinger
P. G. Forand
Ira Fowler

D. T. Frazier
J. L. Gardner
J. G. Gatozzi
Hans Gesund

H. C. Gilbert
J. W. Gladden

The debate then returned to the action on the floor, that of student choice

After further discussion, Dr. Raymond Smith moved the previous question.
This was a cloture motion and required a two—thirds vote.
voted 88 to 30 to close discussion on the matter of student choice.

The Senate

On question of what the Senate was being asked to vote on the Chairman
stated that the question on the floor to be voted on was the following
section of the amendment presented by Dr. Adams, namely:

Following further discussion call was made for a roll call vote on this
part of the amendment. By a roll call vote of 68 for, 45 against, with
16 abstentions, the Senate voted to approve that portion of the amendment
which had been presented by Dr. Adams and which it had been discussing,

areas of study chosen by the student from the following eight

M M M % Z M % M M Z Z Z Z M N Z Z Z

Abstain
Y
Y

F C. P. Graves Y B. C. Pass N
&@ T. C- Gray N A. W. Patrick Y
'1‘,” Brenda Hamer Y J. w. Patterson Y

i E. M. Hammaker Y Nancy Patton Y

/ Richard Hanau N William Peters Y

Mary Hargreaves N P. M. Pinney Y
D. 0. Harris Abstain W. K. Plucknett N x
’ J. G. Harris N L. A. Ravitz Y
M. A. Hatch N J. A. Rea Abstain
V. W. Hays N D. R. Reedy N
' C. F. Haywood Y E. D. Rees Abstain
J. W. Herron N H. G. Reid Y
Da las High Y D. A. Ringe N
D. L. Hochstrasser Y F. J. Rizzo Abstain
Nancy Holland Abstain T. R. Robe Abstain
Howell Hopson Y Irene Roeckel Y
(ﬂak J. W. Hutchinson Y Sheldon Rovin Y
ﬁrﬂ Kate Irvine N W. C. Royster N

‘V D. W. Ivey Y R. W. Rudd N
‘ Pam Johnston Y Betty R. Rudnick Y
j J. R. Jones N J. S. Scarborough Y
% W. S. Jordan Abstain Rudolph Schrils N
‘ F. E. Justus N Albert Sharp Y

I. F. Kanner Abstain J. M. Shepard Y

‘ Don Kirkendall Y Raymond Smith Y

Lois Langhorst Y Stanford Smith Y

I Sara Leech Y Walter Smith N
« T. J. Leonard N W. P. Street Y
I C. T. Lesshafft Y Damon Talley Y
; Kathy Liedtke Y Norman Taylor N
‘ R. M. Longyear Abstain John Thrailkill N
. M. M. Luckens N Nancy Totten Y
[ M. K. Marshall Y s. s. Ulmer Y
1, R. M. McCoy Y John Via Abstain

Agﬂ. W. C. McCrary N J. N. Walker N
{ﬂ/Wn E. P. McCutcheon Y Cynthia Watts Y
‘ M. T. McEllistrem Y Ronald Weddle Y
_ G. E. Mitchell N Scott Wendelsdorf Y
I T. H. Mueller Abstain P3U1 K- Whitaker N
T. P. Mullaney Y Cornelia Wilbur Abstain
Larry Noe Y P. A. Willis Abstain

' Franklin Nooe Y J- W- Wilson Y
Paul Oberst Y A. Wayne Wonderley Y
Paul F. Parker N

Minutes of the University Senate, December 13, 1971 — cont

.4-

{ The Chairman then opened the floor for discussion on the second part of the amendment,
‘ that of the question of the number of areas, which reads as follows:

.. “I ”The General Studies Component in every baccalaureate degree program Shall
(' consist of not more than five (5) — (the exact number to be determined by
each college). .”

Minutes of the University Senate, December 13, 1971 — cont

Following more discussion Professor Rea presented an amendment to strike
the words "not more than” and all of the material in parentheses which
follows those words. It would then read as follows:

i.
”—753,“ 4
['5 ?(§

”The General Studies Component in every baccalaureate degree program
shall consist of five (5) areas of study chosen by the student from
the following eight (8) areas: .”

Further discussion ensued after which Mr. Wendelsdorf moved that the Senate
vote on closing debate on the question of number of areas. The Senate
approved the motion on cloture.

The Senate then approved Professor Rea's amendment to strike the words ”not
more than” and all of the material in parentheses which follows those words.
As approved it now reads:

”The General Studies Component in every baccalaureate degree program ﬁns
shall consist of five (5) areas of study chosen by the student from ”Tﬁv
the following eight (8) areas: ” i
Up to this point, the University Senate had voted to change the University

Senate Rules as follows: f

”The General Studies Component in every baccalaureate degree program
shall consist of five (5) areas of study chosen by the student from
the following eight (8) areas:

(1) Mathematics-Philosophy

(2) Physical Sciences

(3) Biological Sciences

(4) Foreign Languages

(5) Humanities: Literature, Art and Music
(6) History

(7) Social Sciences

(8) Behavioral Sciences

ll
-

Dr. Rea raised the question of implementation date for the approved change.

At this point a point of order was raised that the Senate had not voted

on the amendment as amended. The Parliamentarian stated that the Senate

had already voted on it. A Senator responded that they should have had a
choice of also being permitted to cast a vote ”for at least five”, a

motion which Dr. Stanford Smith had proposed earlier in the meeting and,

as a result of discussion which followed, had, with the consent of the
seconder, withdrawn from the floor. During the confusion that this generated _
the Chairman asked for a vote on the amendment as amended and the Senate [
approved it. ‘

Dr. Ockerman spoke to the question of implementation date and stated that
we are past the deadline in all academic areas for inclusion in the next
issue of the General Catalog and if it is expected that this would be

included in the next issue, it would delay its issuance into the late ,
summer of 1972; that the deadline for inclusion in the Class Schedule for I

'Vrkpawrn-g—u- xn-ch-vtfslav'; my.» mumglgﬂ- . , , ,~ -

Minutes of the University Senate, December 13, 1971 - cont

[ Fall, 1972 is approximately March I, 1972. He also pointed out that all

' but about 1500 students had already registered for the 1972 spring semester;
3% that in order to give academic areas time to review and determine what their
4”, requirements are going to be he did not see how it could possibly be im—
plemented before the 1972 Fall Semester.

i
5

Motion was made and seconded to adjourn. Motion was then made and
seconded for a roll call vote. The motion for a roll call vote was '
disapproved.

Motion was made for a quorum call. It was determined that a quorum was
present.

The Chairman then ruled that the motion to adjourn be voted on. The Senate
approved that motion.

\ Adjournment occurred at 5:30 p.m.

? Elbert W. Ockerman
l Secretary

MINUTES OF THE CALLED MEETING OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE, DECEMBER 20, 1971 j Vi‘ﬂ

The University Senate met in called session at 4:00 p.m., Monday,
December 20, 1971, in the Court Room of the Law Building. Chairman Rovin
presided. Members absent: Staley F. Adams*, Arnold D. Albright, Daniel
S. Arnold*, Ronald Atwood, James R. Barclay, Charles E. Barnhart, Wendell E.
Berry, Harmon Bickley, Harry M. Bohannan, Garnett L. Bradford*, Eugene B.
Bradley, Betty J. Brannan*, C. Frank Buck, Collins W. Burnett*, Ralph S.
Carpenter*, S. K. Chan*, Carl B. Cone*, Glenwood L. Creech, George W.
Denemark, Loretta Denman*, James H. Eley, Paul T. Ferrellﬁ Paul G. Forand,
Lawrence Forgy, Jr., Stuart Forth*, Donald T. Frazier*, George H. Gadbois*,
‘ Jess L. Gardner*, Richard E. Gift*, Brenda J. Hamer, Joseph Hamburg, Virgil W. ‘ﬂ
Hays*, James W. Herron*, Donald L. Hochstrasser*, Alfred S. L. Hu, Kate T. ' ﬂ
Irvine*, Raymon D. Johnson*, William S. Jordan, Jr.*, Fred E. Justus*, 3W
Irving F. Kanner*, Don Kirkendall*, Stuart M. Klein, James A. Knoblett, Lois W.
Langhorst*, Bruce E. Langlois, Sara H. Leech, Donald C. Leigh*, Kathy Liedtke,
Donald L. Madden, Paul Mandelstam*, Leslie L. Martin*, George E. Mitchell*,
James T. Moore, Thomas P. Mullaney, Jacqueline A. Noonan*, Paul Obersﬁi Curtis
Phipps, Paul M. Pinney*, Nicholas J. Pisacano, Leonard A. Ravitz*, E. Douglas
Rees, Herbert G. Reid*, Donald A. Ringe, Virginia Rogers, John Scarborough,*
Donald S. Shannon*, D. Milton Shuffett*, John B. Stephenson*, Leonard P.
Stoltz*, W. Paul Street*, Thomas B. Stroup, Charles G. Talbert*, Norman L.
Taylor, Nancy K. Totten, H. Mac Vandiviere*, Kenneth E. Vanlandingham, John A.
Via*, John N. Walker, M. Stanley Wall, Charles A. Walton, Cynthia Watts,
Ronald D. Weddle*, David R. Wekstein*, Paul K. Whitaker*, William R. Willard,

Constance P. Wilson*, and Miroslava B. Winer*.

*Absence explained

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
STUDENT‘GOVERNMENT

Student Center

LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY 40506

SCOTT WENDELSDORF REBECCA WESTERFIELD

PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT

December 9, 1971

MEMORANDUM

TO: Members, University Senate
FROM: Scott Wendelsdorf, Senator
SUBJECT: Clarification of Agenda Item for Senate Meeting, December 13, 1971

Proposing Change in the Senate Rules Regarding the General Studies
Component

‘ It has become apparent that several Senators have misinterpreted the
proposed amendment to change the General Studies Component. After re-examining
the motion, I tend to agree that seme ambiguity is present.

I Corrective amendments will be offered from the floor, but I would like
to explain briefly the intent behind the motion.

Presently, every baccalaureate degree program must include a General
Studies Component consisting of at least 5 of 8 areas of study, (1) Mathematics~
Philosophy, (2) Physical Sciences, (3) Biological Sciences, (4) Foreign
Languages, (5) Humanities: Literature, Art and Music, (6) History, 'h'
(7) Social Sciences, (8) Behavioral Sciences. Each college now decides
both how many of the 8 areas a student must take and which areas he or she
must take e.g. the Arts and Sciences language requirement. Under the amendment
this will be changed. Under this proposal, two things will happen: (1) each
college.will be able to require no more than 5 of the 8 areas of study for
graduation; (2) most importantly, Egg student, not the college, will choose
which areas she or he will take to satisfy the requirement. In short, while
the present rule allows the college to determine both how many and which of
the 8 areas of study a student must take, the amendment will allow the college
to choose only the number of areas required (but not more than S) and the student
will determine which areas. A student may take a greater number of areas than
required by the college but not less. Colleges determine number 9: areas.
Stgdents determine which areas.

LHHVERSHY OF KENTUCKY

LEXINGTON. KENTUCKY 40506

DEAN OF ADMISSIONS AND REGISTRAR DECe‘Inber 3 1971
' 5

TO MEMBERS OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE

The University Senate will meet in regular session at 3:00 p.m.,
Monday, December 13, 1971, in the Student Center Theatre.

Action items on the agenda will include a proposed change in the
Rules of the University Senate relative to the General Studies Component.
Discussion items on the agenda will include a proposal on ROTC forwarded
by the College of Arts and Sciences faculty (including a proposal by USAC
which was tabled by the Senate at its meeting last May). Each of the
above two proposals are being mailed to you under date of December 3, 1971.

We wish to remind you again of the End—of—Semester Social in honor of
the Board of Trustees to be held from 5:00 to 8:00 p.m., Tuesday, December
14th, in the Helen G. King Alumni House.

gﬁéw w. OakerxégWR

Secretary